Can Coke remove the stains from FIFA?

Amidst scandal and corruption, top corporate sponsors demand a third-party commission to oversee FIFA reforms.

Arnd Wiegmann/Reuters
FIFA President Sepp Blatter reacts to banknotes thrown at him by British comedian known as Lee Nelson (unseen) while arriving for a news conference after the Extraordinary FIFA Executive Committee Meeting at the FIFA headquarters in Zurich, Switzerland July 20, 2015.

FIFA president Sepp Blatter was showered with fake dollar bills by a British comedian at a press conference in Switzerland on Monday. But the prank is the least of his current concerns, as longtime-sponsors of soccer’s premier governing body are demanding, "one or more eminent impartial leaders to manage the efforts necessary to help reform FIFA's governance and its human rights requirements," according to correspondence obtained by BBC.

Coca-Cola wrote to FIFA on July 9 saying, “We believe that establishing this independent commission will be the most credible way for FIFA to approach its reform process and is necessary to build back the trust it has lost.”

FIFA has severely struggled with credibility since May, when allegations of corruption led to the arrest of numerous top officials; separate US and Swiss investigations have been launched.

“If you touch our shores with your corrupt enterprise ... you will be held accountable for that corruption,” said James Comey, US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director, in May.

The US case is examining allegations of bribes "totaling more than $100 million" tied to commercial deals dating to the 1990s for soccer tournaments in the US and Latin America, according to the Swiss Federal Office of Justice. Talk of vote-buying, bribery, racketeering, money laundering, and other criminal embroilments by top officials exponentially intensified this past spring, although they have hounded FIFA for years, and now accusations of FIFA-related human-rights abuses in Qatar have arisen as the nation prepares for the 2022 World Cup.

Mr. Blatter, president of FIFA since 1998, announced he would resign from his post on June 2, 2015. He cited the lack of a fan mandate as his reason for leaving the organization, which he has been officially affiliated with since 1981 when he began as general-secretary; a special congress will to be held on February 26, 2016 in Zurich to elect a new president. In his resignation, Blatter called for “deep-rooted structural change,”  within competitive soccer’s governing body.

Visa has issued the most dire warning of the corporate sponsors, saying that if FIFA fails to take “swift and immediate” steps to remedy the issues present, then the international credit card company will "reassess [their] sponsorship." McDonald’s, another sponsor of the World Cup, has stated FIFA needs to make “meaningful changes.”

Coca-Cola explained the logic behind the third-party reform commission oversight saying, "We are calling for this approach out of our deep commitment to ethics and human rights and in the interest of seeing FIFA succeed." 

While the science of corruption is difficult to unravel, FIFA may benefit through third-party oversight, as suggested by top corporate sponsors.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.