'El Chapo' escape: Why did it take 18 minutes to notice Guzmán was missing?

Lawmakers say Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán's escape was not reported until 18-20 minutes after he slipped out of Mexican prison. The Attorney General’s office is looking into any intentional delay in issuing an alert after Guzman’s escape.

Marco Ugarte/AP
A Federal Police presses on a reward notice for information leading to the capture of drug lord Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán, who made his escape from the Altiplano maximum security prison via an underground tunnel, in Almoloya, west of Mexico City, Thursday. The Mexican government is offering a reward of $3.8 million for Guzman's recapture.

It took at least 18 minutes before anyone was alerted to the escape of the drug lord Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, two lawmakers said Thursday one day after touring the escape tunnel used by the prisoner.

Aleida Alavez, deputy of Mexico's leftist Democratic Revolution Party, told The Associated Press that when National Security Commissioner Monte Alejandro Rubido was asked on Wednesday about the time elapse in Mr. Guzmán’s escape, he first hesitated, but then answered that the report came 18 minutes after the escape.

Adriana Gonzalez, deputy of the conservative National Action Party, also said she did not hear Mr. Rubido give that account, but according to personnel monitoring the cameras, Mexico's most prized prisoner had about 20 minutes to slip into a mile-long tunnel Saturday night.

Ms. Gonzalez said she had been told that no one person was exclusively monitoring Guzmán at the time of the escape, but prison personnel was monitoring the video feeds from 20 separate cameras on two screens.

The footage of Guzmán’s cell released to the public Tuesday showed he disappeared from the camera sight at 8:50 p.m.

Gonzalez was shown about five minutes footage of Guzmán’s cell the night of his escape, and she says all that was visible was an empty cell. "The image stayed the same and time is passing and minute 56, 57 and no one appears," she said.

Officials have not yet publicly announced the time lapse in Guzmán’s escape.

The case is still under investigation. The Attorney General’s Office is both studying the escape and looking into any possible breach of prison protocols or intentional delay in issuing an alert after Guzmán’s escape.

At least 30 prison officials are being questioned over the breakout.

“Mexican public opinion already perceives that there’s collusion between the armed forces and organized crime,” Armand Peschard-Sverdrup, senior associate for the Americas program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies told The Christian Science Monitor's Whitney Eulich shortly after the escape. “This [escape] only fuels that perception, whether it’s merited or not."

Jorge Chabat, a drug war and security expert at Mexico City’s Center for Research and Teaching in Economics told the Monitor that Guzmán’s capture was a huge win for Mexico President Enrique Peña Nieto. “But his escape is far worse than had he never been captured in the first place... I’m not sure how they can recover from this, but the next few days will be key,” he adds.

Guzmán, leader of the Sinaloa cartel, previously slipped out of Mexican prison in 2001 in a laundry basket. He was not recaptured until February 2014. US agents’ documents obtained by the AP suggest he began planning his escape immediately after that arrest. 

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.