Could hostage James Foley have been rescued?

Some officials are saying the administration had enough information on American and British hostages to make moves much sooner than it did. 

Steven Senne/AP/File
Journalist James Foley poses for a photo during an interview with The Associated Press in Boston. A memorial service is scheduled Saturday, Oct. 18, 2014, in Foley's hometown of Rochester, N.H., on what would have been his 41st birthday. Foley was abducted in Syria on Thanksgiving Day 2012, and a video by Islamic State militants that purported to show his killing by the militant group was released Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2014.

New information that the Obama administration had sufficient intelligence on American and British hostages held by the Islamic State weeks before a raid sign-off is raising questions about whether the rescue mission may have been needlessly – and fatally – delayed.

The administration allegedly had "strong and specific information" about the location of American James Foley and other hostages in Syria as early as May, Fox News reported, citing an anonymous source described as "close to the discussions."

But approval for the rescue mission didn't come until July, which suggests the operation may have been "unnecessarily delayed" for up to five weeks as the administration developed further intelligence, Fox reported.

The source – whose information was corroborated by others – told Fox the captors were secure enough in their stronghold in Raqqa, Syria, that hostages were moved between a "handful" of facilities, and by late spring the Americans and British had been held for at least three weeks in one location.

Fox pointed out that the timeline seems to conflict with White House claims the administration moved as quickly as intelligence allowed.

A National Security Council statement Monday to Fox did not dispute the strength of the information about hostage location but said: "U.S. forces conducted this operation as soon as the President and his national security team were confident the mission could be carried out successfully and consistent with our policies for undertaking such operations."

After the video of Foley's execution was posted on Aug. 20, his parents said they also believed location information was available "long before" the July rescue attempt.

"Like all Americans, we felt our government would succeed at whatever it decided to do, and were certainly dismayed that the effort was unsuccessful," John Foley, James's father, told Fox at the time.

Foley's family was previously informed that efforts to free their son could land them in jail or facing a lawsuit.

The administration told the family, who had begun raising money to potentially pay a ransom, that it was illegal.

Repeated warning "apparently gave the Foleys the impression that the United States was more concerned about following a rule than bringing James Foley home alive," the Monitor reported.

"As an American I was embarrassed and appalled, you know. I think our efforts to get Jim freed were an annoyance," Diane Foley, James's mother, told CNN.

"I just think we needed a little more information and a little more trust," Mr. Foley told Fox. "We felt like outsiders asking favors."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Could hostage James Foley have been rescued?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today