Bangladesh worried about Modi election impact

Bangladesh's garment-dependent economy and volatile politics are often influenced by the goings-on in Delhi.

Ajit Solanki/AP
India's next prime minister and Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Narendra Modi attends the swearing in ceremony of the new Chief Minister of Gujarat state Anandiben Patel in Gandhinagar, India, Thursday.

Narendra Modi’s landslide election as prime minister of India has provoked a round of hand-wringing in neighboring Bangladesh, whose garment-dependent economy and volatile politics are often influenced by the goings-on in Delhi.

But people may be jumping to conclusions, says our correspondent on the ground.

The concerns stem in part from reports that Mr. Modi has pledged to take a harder line in kicking illegal Bangladeshi immigrants out of in India. And for some in predominantly Muslim Bangladesh, Modi’s Hindu nationalist reputation and his alleged role in anti-Muslim riots in 2002 have provoked concerns.

Moreover, Bangladesh’s ruling Awami League has historical ties with India’s now-defeated Congress Party. It was Congress-led India that intervened militarily in then-East Pakistan’s bloody independence war with Islamabad in 1971 to ensure the birth of Bangladesh. And India was the only major country to endorse Bangladesh’s highly controversial election earlier this year, in which the Awami League won a commanding majority amid a boycott by the main opposition.

“There is a general perception that when Congress is in power and Awami League is in power, the relationship is good,” says our correspondent on the ground in Dhaka.

Whether that’s actually the case, however, is far from clear, given a host of unresolved disputes over water issues, border killings, and trade...For the rest of the story, continue reading at our new business publication Monitor Global Outlook.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.