Putin at No. 1: Russian media crows, and complains, about Forbes ranking

Russian media cheered Forbes' decision to name Vladimir Putin the world's most powerful person in 2013. But they also took umbrage at how he was described by the magazine.

Michael Klimentyev/Kremlin/RIA Novosti/Reuters
Russian President Vladimir Putin looks on during a meeting with Serbian President Tomislav Nikolic Wednesday in the Kremlin. Mr. Putin was named the world's most powerful man in 2013 by Forbes magazine.

Vladimir Putin is the world's most powerful person in 2013, according to Forbes magazine, which has taken it upon itself to compile a controversial "most powerful" list every year since 2009.

This year it has 72 names of people who "matter the most," including 17 heads of state, 27 business kingpins, assorted politicians and bureaucrats, one drug trafficker, one pope and – with a bit of overlap – 28 billionaires.

In a breezy explanation of its methodology, the magazine says that top editors consider the extent of a candidate's power over people, financial resources, influence in multiple spheres, and whether the person's authority is effectively wielded.

For three of first four years of the list's existence US President Barack Obama was the anointed No. 1. And rightly so. By almost any calculus, whether GDP, diplomatic heft, or military might, the leader of the United States ought to be pretty much guaranteed that slot every single time. But, perhaps just to mix it up, the editors of Forbes gave the top honor to Chinese President Hu Jintao in 2010.

Russians are already clinking their tea glasses in celebration, seeing in this fairly prominent global ranking a validation not only of Russia's inexorable rise on the world stage, but also of US decline.

The Kremlin-funded English-language TV network, RT, managed to make all those points while still decrying the lamentable double-standards employed by Forbes editors.

"Apparently, Putin’s first place on Forbes couldn’t appear without ready-made clichés in the description and accompanying articles, with terms like 'autocratic leader,' 'ex-KGB strongman,' and 'dictator' littered everywhere. His counterpart Obama, on the other hand, has been depicted as 'the handcuffed head of the most dominant country,' but still the 'leader of the free world,'" RT complained.

Citing its reasons for promoting Mr. Putin to the top of the list this year, while Mr. Obama fell back to second place, Forbes said that "Putin has solidified his control over Russia and anyone watching the chess match over Syria has a clear idea of the shift in the power towards Putin on the global stage. The ex-KGB strongman – who controls a nuclear-tipped army, a permanent seat on the UN Security Council and some of the world's largest oil and gas reserves – is allowed to serve another six-year term, which could keep him in office until 2024."

The most important factor was Syria, where a Russian proposal to put Syrian chemical weapons under international control appears to have shifted the focus from military strikes to diplomacy after Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad was accused of using poison gas against civilians.

In September, Putin penned an influential commentary in the New York Times, appealing to Americans to see the logic of Russia's position on Syria and forgo their own misguided tendency to see the US as "exceptional." That brought a testy cold war-style response from US Senator John McCain, who published his anti-Putin polemic in one of the modern successors to the former Soviet Communist Party newspaper Pravda.

Putin's ability to stand up to the US over the issue of fugitive ex-National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, to whom Russia granted a year's refuge despite stiff US objections last August, was another factor in Putin's rise to the top, the magazine said.

"Even if this rating is subjective, it's another sign that Russia's prestige is rising," says Olga Kryshtanovskaya, one of Russia's top political sociologists.

"I don't think this changes anything inside Russia. People who hated Putin will go on doing so, those who are loyal to him will be proud of this [new sign of recognition]. But it's an acknowledgement of the fact that, thanks to Russia, bloodshed in Syria was prevented," she says. "This is a very important fact."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Putin at No. 1: Russian media crows, and complains, about Forbes ranking
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2013/1031/Putin-at-No.-1-Russian-media-crows-and-complains-about-Forbes-ranking
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe