Winner of most 2012 Olympic defections: Cameroon

Economic misery (or opportunity) drives many Olympic athletes to defect in modern times, but political defections still plague communist bloc teams such as Cuba.

Ivan Sekretarev/AP
Paddy Barnes of Ireland (r.) makes contact with Thomas Essomba of Cameroon, during their fight at the men's light flyweight boxing competition at the 2012 Summer Olympics in London. This year, 15 African athletes and coaches have defected, with Cameroon in the lead - seven of its 37 athletes have been confirmed missing, including Essomba.

After the medal count comes the head count.

This year’s Olympics in London brought news of Olympic athletes who defected, disappeared, or went on the run, some of them before they even had a chance to compete, more than 20 at last count. Olympic defections are a relatively common affair, but the end of the cold war in 1989 meant that most modern sports defections – with the possible exception of Cuba, the grand champion of defection – are largely economically motivated.

This year, 15 African athletes and coaches have defected, with Cameroon in the lead – seven of its 37 athletes have been confirmed missing. The first to leave was Drusille Ngako, a goalkeeper on the women’s soccer team, followed soon after by swimmer Paul Ekane Edingue, and boxers Thomas Essomba, Christian Donfack Adjoufack, Mewoli Abdon, Blaise Yepmou Mendouo, and Serge Ambomo.

Athletes weren’t the only ones to disappear. Four Congolese team members, including a coach and a technical athletic director, also failed to return to their home countries after the Olympic Games ended last week.

Ethiopia also deserves honorable mention for the disappearance of 15-year-old torch bearer Nathaniel Yemane, who was later found “safe and well” in Nottingham. Apparently, Nathaniel simply got lost. 

Seventy years ago, Olympic defections were all about cold war politics. Marie Provaznikova, a Czech gymnastics coach, was the first to defect in 1948, soon after the Soviet Union turned what was then Czechoslovakia into a client state. 

But since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, most defections have been economically motivated.

The benefits of flight are easy to understand. Olympic athletes may be among the better fed and looked after citizens in their home countries, but few will have experienced the modern conveniences of even a basic hotel in London. Thousands of Africans every year pay top dollar to human traffickers for the chance to cross the Mediterranean, without visas, as stowaways on cargo ships to Europe, and hundreds more of middle-class tourists or university students overstay their visas and seek asylum. That a few Cameroonian athletes would do so as well should come as no surprise.

Political defections still happen, but even for communist Cuba, the grand champion of defection, athlete disappearances can be blamed on filthy lucre. In a country where athletes are paid $16 monthly salaries at home (and $300 stipends for gold-medal winners), but could earn as much as $30 million just 90 miles away in the United States (as Cuban pitcher Aroldis Chapman did, by signing a five-year contract with the Cincinnati Reds), money does hold a certain allure.

Sadly, the job market that the 15 African athletes will find themselves in, in the European Union, is hardly robust. According to Eurostat, the European Union’s statistics agency, some 25 million people living in the Euro zone are unemployed, a rate of some 11.2 percent. For swimmers, boxers, and even coaches, it might be difficult to find even a job as a waiter or a construction worker.

But back home in Cameroon, many young people say they hold no grudge against the defected athletes. Cameroonian journalist Jean-Bruno Tagne told Radio Netherlands Worldwide in the Cameroonian capital of Yaounde, “Having been around these sportsmen and knowing the conditions under which they live and train, we can at least understand that, in a survival reflex, they try to flee.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Winner of most 2012 Olympic defections: Cameroon
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today