Falklands War 30th Anniversary: 5 British and Argentine papers react

April 2, 2012 marks the 30th anniversary of the Falklands War, which lasted less than three months but claimed the lives of more than 900 soldiers.  Here are five reactions from Argentine and British newspapers on the anniversary of the Falkland Islands War:

Argentina should put sovereignty aside and jointly benefit from resources

The Daily Mail, UK
The Falklands War thirty years on
Michael Burleigh

“Today, rightly, those who died defending the Falkland islanders against a murderous fascistic Argentinian junta are being given brief prominence. It is worth recalling that in the course of trying to forge a 'new man' … the clerico-fascist dictatorship murdered around 11,000 people...
One way of making the Argentine 'new man' was to exploit territorial disputes. Brazil was too near and powerful to try it on over the Parana River, ditto Pinochet's Chile over the Beagle Channel. That left the Malvinas as patriotic Argentines call the Falklands. The sovereign power was very remote, and all prior signals from the Foreign Office were appeasing. A culture in which machismo was dominant could not take a female British prime minister seriously either. That was a costly underestimation of Margaret Thatcher.

[I]n the late nineteenth century, British investment in Latin America was greater than in the whole of sub-Saharan Africa. It is an important part of the world, about which recent governments have often been negligent...
Argentina should put the narrow issue of sovereignty to one side so as to jointly benefit with the UK from the vast economic resources of the South Atlantic. Neither country can afford, or needs, another war.... Let's hope commonsense and goodwill prevail three decades later.”

3 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.