British elections: Has the Conservative Party finally had enough?

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has yet again found himself in a tight spot after his government was rocked by the resignation of two top ministers and a slew of more junior officials. Mr. Johnson remains steadfast in his resolve to come out on top.

|
Frank Augstein/AP
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson leaves 10 Downing Street in London, July 6, 2022. After narrowly escaping a no-confidence vote last month, a slew of resignations this week from Conservative Party top ministers and junior officials is testing Mr. Johnson's authority.

A defiant British Prime Minister Boris Johnson battled to stay in power Wednesday after the resignation of two top ministers and a slew of more junior officials, who said they could no longer serve under his scandal-tarred leadership.

Mr. Johnson is known for his uncanny ability to wiggle out of tight spots, but a series of accusations of misdeeds have pushed him to the brink, and some of his fellow Conservative lawmakers now worry that the leader renowned for his affability could be a liability in elections.

Many are also concerned about the ability of a weakened Mr. Johnson, who only narrowly survived a no-confidence vote last month, to govern at a time of increasing economic and social strain.

At the weekly Prime Minister’s Questions session in Parliament on Wednesday, members of the opposition Labor Party shouted “Go! Go!’’

Then, more damningly, members of his own Conservative Party challenged the leader. Lawmaker Tim Loughton was the first to ask whether there was anything that might prompt him to resign.

“Frankly the job of the prime minister in difficult circumstances, when he’s been given a colossal mandate, is to keep going,’’ Mr. Johnson replied.

His fellow Conservatives listened quietly, offering little support.

He must still get through a long-scheduled interrogation by a committee of senior lawmakers later in the day.

How he handles the tough questions could indicate whether a simmering rebellion in his Conservative Party can gather enough strength to oust him. Also on the horizon is a vote in a powerful party committee that could signal whether lawmakers have the appetite to push for another no-confidence measure.

Months of discontent over Mr. Johnson’s judgment and ethics within the governing Conservative Party erupted with the resignations of Treasury chief Rishi Sunak and Health Secretary Sajid Javid within minutes of each other on Tuesday evening. The two heavyweights of the Cabinet were responsible for tackling two of the biggest issues facing Britain – the cost-of-living crisis and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

In a scathing letter, Mr. Sunak said “the public rightly expect [the] government to be conducted properly, competently, and seriously. … I believe these standards are worth fighting for and that is why I am resigning.”

Mr. Javid said the party needed “humility, grip, and a new direction” but “it is clear this situation will not change under your leadership.”

Mindful of the need to shore up confidence, Mr. Johnson quickly replaced the two ministers, promoting Nadhim Zahawi from the education department to treasury chief and installing his chief of staff, Steve Barclay, as health secretary.

But a string of resignations late Tuesday and early Wednesday from more junior ministers – from both the liberal and right-wing branches of the Conservative Party – showed that danger to Mr. Johnson was far from over.

In the past few months, Mr. Johnson has been fined by police and slammed by an investigator’s report for government parties that flouted the COVID-19 restrictions they imposed on others; saw 41% of Conservative lawmakers vote to oust him in the no-confidence vote; and watched formerly loyal lieutenants urge him to resign.

Through it all, he has vowed to carry on governing – even suggesting he wanted to stay in office until the 2030s.

But former International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell was among several members of the Conservative Party who told Mr. Johnson his time was up.

“It’s a bit like the death of Rasputin. He’s been poisoned, stabbed, he’s been shot, his body’s been dumped in a freezing river and still he lives,’’ he told the BBC. “But this is an abnormal prime minister, a brilliantly charismatic, very funny, very amusing, big, big character. But I’m afraid he has neither the character nor the temperament to be our prime minister.”

The final straw for Mr. Sunak and Mr. Javid was the prime minister’s shifting explanations about his handling of sexual misconduct allegations against a senior Conservative lawmaker.

Last week, Chris Pincher resigned as Conservative deputy chief whip after complaints he groped two men at a private club. That triggered a series of reports about past allegations leveled against Mr. Pincher and questions about what Mr. Johnson knew when he tapped Mr. Pincher for a senior job enforcing party discipline.

Mr. Johnson’s office initially said he wasn’t aware of the previous accusations when he promoted Mr. Pincher in February. By Monday, a spokesman said Mr. Johnson did know of the allegations – but they were “either resolved or did not progress to a formal complaint.”

When a former top civil servant in the Foreign Office contradicted that, saying Mr. Johnson was briefed about a 2019 allegation that resulted in a formal complaint, Mr. Johnson’s office said the prime minister had forgotten about the briefing.

It was all too much for ministers who have been sent onto radio and TV to defend the government’s position, only to find it changed.

Bim Afolami, who quit as Conservative Party vice chairman on Tuesday, said he had been willing to give Mr. Johnson the benefit of the doubt – until the Pincher affair.

“The difficulty is not overall the program of the government. … The government has done a lot of positive things that unite the Conservative Party,’’ he said. “The problem is character and integrity in Downing Street, and I think that people in the Conservative party and people in the country know that.”

But Paul Drexler, chair of the International Chambers of Commerce, warned that soaring food and energy prices are reaching crisis proportions and need to be addressed by a leader who isn’t distracted.

“I would say the most important thing to do is to feed people who are hungry,’’ he told the BBC. “I mean that is a burning platform at the moment. The poorest in our society are going to be starving to death [in] the second half of this year. That needs to be addressed.”

Mr. Johnson’s opponents in the party hope more Cabinet ministers will follow Mr. Sunak and Mr. Javid, though for now other top officials – including Foreign Secretary Liz Truss, Defense Secretary Ben Wallace and Home Secretary Priti Patel – are staying put.

Opponents are also trying to force another no-confidence vote over the prime minister. The existing rules require 12 months between such votes, but the rules are made by a party committee and can be changed. Elections for that committee’s executive are due in the next few weeks.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to British elections: Has the Conservative Party finally had enough?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2022/0706/British-elections-Has-the-Conservative-Party-finally-had-enough
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe