UK and France are butting heads over migration. Is Brexit to blame?

|
Gareth Fuller/PA/AP
A group of people thought to be migrants are brought in to Dover, England, following a small boat incident in the English Channel, Jan. 4, 2022. At least 28,300 people packed into small boats crossed the channel from France to England’s south coast in 2021, an annual record that was three times the number of crossings a year earlier.
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 3 Min. )

After the deaths of 27 migrants during their attempt to cross the English Channel to reach the United Kingdom in November, diplomatic tensions between France and the U.K. rose to new heights. But the tragedy is hardly the first time the neighbors have been faced with the challenge of migration.

The U.K. has long been seen as an attractive destination for economic migrants and asylum-seekers, whether it’s to join family, seek economic opportunity, or escape crisis. But France and the U.K. have struggled to create an effective legal framework to tackle the issue.

Why We Wrote This

As migrants risk the English Channel to enter the United Kingdom, relations between Paris and London have soured. A key cause is Brexit and all the legal mechanisms it has undone.

Brexit looks to be an additional challenge as the countries seek solutions. When the transition period of Britain’s departure from the European Union ended on Dec. 31, 2020, so too did its commitment to the Dublin Regulation – which set terms for returning asylum-seekers to safe EU countries through which they’d traveled. Now any asylum-seekers who reach the U.K. from France are “stuck” there, since the two countries don’t have an agreed legal framework to send them back.

To move forward, the U.K. will have to maintain close ties with Europe post-Brexit, “which is exactly what [British Prime Minister Boris] Johnson does not want,” says French and EU policy expert Christian Lequesne.

At the end of November, a boat filled with over 30 migrants seeking a better life in the United Kingdom set off from the coast of northern France. But the passengers’ dreams were cut short when the waters of the English Channel proved too much for their flimsy dinghy. A total of 27 people died.

In the days following the incident, diplomatic tensions between the two countries rose to new heights, as British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and French President Emmanuel Macron went back and forth over who was to blame.  

The tragedy is hardly the first time France and the U.K. have been faced with the challenge of migration. The neighbors have long struggled to create a lasting and effective legal framework to tackle the issue, and Brexit looks to be an additional challenge as the countries seek new solutions.

Why We Wrote This

As migrants risk the English Channel to enter the United Kingdom, relations between Paris and London have soured. A key cause is Brexit and all the legal mechanisms it has undone.

What is the migration crisis all about?

The U.K. has long been seen as an attractive destination for economic migrants and asylum-seekers, whether it’s to join family, seek economic opportunity, or escape crisis. Since the 1990s, displaced people have been arriving in northern France, primarily the port town of Calais, to attempt the channel crossing.

Migrants have tried hiding in trucks and clinging onto trains, but the British government has invested in high-security fencing and security cameras to protect the ports and Eurotunnel. Now the migrants are paying people-smugglers to take them across the channel in small boats. In 2021 alone, more than 25,700 people made the 21-mile journey by boat – three times more than the previous year.

Why is migration such a problem now?

The short answer is Brexit. When the transition period of Britain’s departure from the European Union ended on Dec. 31, 2020, so too did its commitment to the Dublin Regulation – which set terms for returning asylum-seekers to safe EU countries through which they’d traveled. Now any asylum-seekers who reach the U.K. from France are “stuck” there, insofar as the two countries don’t have an agreed legal framework to send them back. 

Rafael Yaghobzadeh/AP/File
A migrants' makeshift camp is set up in Calais, France, on Nov. 27, 2021. Calais is a key launching point for migrants trying to reach England.

Further complicating matters is the U.K.’s proposed Nationality and Borders bill, which critics say penalizes refugees seeking asylum in the U.K. Those found entering illegally could face up to four years in prison under the new measures. Meanwhile, the French government has struggled to process asylum claims – over 80,000 were received in 2020. Applications can take years in some cases, and there is not enough emergency housing.

“The British government has made it more difficult for migrants to enter the U.K., so they’re taking greater risks,” says Paul Smith, a professor of French politics at the University of Nottingham. “Meanwhile, the French are not compelled by law to keep [migrants]. But the bottom line is, the people who left France want to be in Britain.”

How might France and Britain resolve the conflict?

France has accused the U.K. of stoking the issue. But it has not been the only sticking point in post-Brexit negotiations. The two governments have been at odds over fishing licenses in shared waters as well as trade agreements with Northern Ireland.

In order to move forward on all of these issues, the U.K. will have to maintain close ties with Europe post-Brexit, “which is exactly what Mr. Johnson does not want,” says Christian Lequesne, an expert in French and EU policy at Sciences Po in Paris.

It’s especially challenging at a time when leaders on both sides of the channel are focused on other matters. Mr. Johnson is struggling to contain record-breaking COVID-19 cases, and Mr. Macron is busy with his new role as rotating EU president while also campaigning for his next French presidential bid.

Professor Smith predicts that Mr. Macron will let the current crisis ease before proposing new measures. Still, the human aspect of migration will inevitably push the issue up the agenda in both countries.

“With migration, you can have tragic consequences, which makes it much more sensitive than fishing rights [or trade wars],” says Dr. Lequesne. “It’s not possible for the U.K. to ignore what is going on in Europe after Brexit. ... They have public policies to manage and need to find ways to collaborate.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to UK and France are butting heads over migration. Is Brexit to blame?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2022/0105/UK-and-France-are-butting-heads-over-migration.-Is-Brexit-to-blame
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe