EU proposes migration policy reforms for more equal distribution

The European Union is hoping to overhaul its migration policies and distribute the costs and responsibility of taking in migrants more evenly across the bloc. Those rescued at sea would be relocated in the bloc, rather than being sent back.

Panagiotis Balaskas/AP
Migrants gather in a new, temporary refugee camp in Kara Tepe, Greece, on Sept. 19, 2020. The failures of Europe's refugee policy were on display earlier this month when the migrants' previous camp, which was notoriously overcrowded, was ravaged in a fire.

The European Union’s executive proposed on Wednesday overhauling the bloc’s broken migration and asylum rules, seeking to end years of feuds and bitterness over how to handle the many people fleeing conflict and poverty in the Middle East and Africa.

The most contentious element would impose a legal obligation on each state to host an assigned number of refugees – something eastern nations including Poland and Hungary are dead against – as well as other forms of “mandatory solidarity.”

Each state would receive $11,750 per adult taken in, funded from the bloc’s budget.

Endless rows over where to locate refugees and migrants have caused bad blood between the Mediterranean countries where they mainly come, the reluctant easterners, and the richer northern states where many of the new arrivals aspire to live.

The bloc was caught off guard in 2015 when more than a million people made it to EU shores, overwhelming security and welfare networks and fomenting far-right sentiment.

But the bloc’s top migration official said the crisis was over, with the EU now receiving some 1.5 million net new foreigners coming legally to live and work per year, compared to only 140,000 asylum seekers arriving irregularly.

“We need these people,” said Swedish EU Home Affairs Commissioner, Ylva Johansson. “Managing migration is not about finding a perfect solution but a solution acceptable to all.”

The executive European Commission’s plans to overhaul its defunct system include scratching a rule that the first EU country of arrival be responsible for asylum requests, which put too much burden on Mediterranean nations.

Under the new proposal, those arriving would be assigned to specific countries based on family links, history of education or work, or having a visa issued by a member state.

‘Mandatory solidarity’

In the 400-page proposal spanning five different pan-EU laws, Ms. Johansson put emphasis on sending back those who fail to win asylum.

“It’s necessary to have the acceptance of EU citizens to relocate [host] those who have the right to stay to be able to send back those who are not eligible,” she said.

The plan, sure to stir up heated disputes, would also aim to open up more legal routes for refugees and migrants, and work more closely with countries hosting and managing people before they reach Europe.

It would also put EU countries with external borders under closer monitoring to ensure they do not violate the law after multiple reports of pushbacks in Hungary, Croatia, Greece, and Malta.

Under the plan, people rescued at sea would have to be relocated in the bloc – rather than sent back – and the Commission recommended that member states do not criminalize charities involved in such rescues.

At times of regular immigration, all EU states would be obliged to help under the new idea of “mandatory solidarity” by relocating or returning people, or offering material assistance on the ground in arrival countries.

If, however, a country were falling under major pressure, it could seek to activate a crisis mechanism under which its EU peers would be obliged to take people in or send them back.

The complex system would eventually lead to each EU country having to take in some refugees.

Despite having German Chancellor Angela Merkel as the driving force behind it, the plan faces an uphill battle. The Commission said all elements should be in place from 2023.

“My guess is that I will have zero member states saying it’s a perfect proposal,” said Ms. Johansson. “But I do hope that I’ll also have 27 member states saying it’s a balanced approach and let’s work on this. ... It’s about realizing we have a common problem and we have to manage it together.”

After opening Germany’s doors to Syrian refugees back in 2015, Ms. Merkel suffered electoral setbacks as the far right surged on anti-immigration sentiment.

But in a sign of the changing mood, German mayors offered this month to take in refugees after an overcrowded camp on the Greek island of Lesbos burnt to the ground. Protesters took to the streets in many German cities chanting, “We have space!”

This story was reported by Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to EU proposes migration policy reforms for more equal distribution
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today