Russia's latest reform allows Putin to stay in power past 2024

The constitutional reform that would allow Vladimir Putin to stay in power until 2036 prompted calls for Russian opposition protests. These changes redistribute the executive powers and further reinforce the power of presidency.

Alexei Nikolsky/Kremlin/Sputnik/Reuters
Russian President Vladimir Putin attends a session of the lower house of parliament to consider constitutional changes in Moscow, Russia, March 10, 2020. On March 11, the parliament approved a reform that would extend the length of his presidency for two more terms.

The Russian parliament approved a sweeping constitutional reform in the third and final reading Wednesday, a move that will allow President Vladimir Putin to stay in power for another 12 years after his current term ends in 2024.

The Kremlin-controlled lower house, the State Duma, endorsed a set of amendments to the constitution and a provision resetting the term count for Putin after the revised constitution goes into force. It passed by a 383-0 vote with 43 abstentions, and was approved by the upper house, the Federation Council, several hours later.

A nationwide vote on the proposed amendments is set for April 22.

Kremlin critics condemned the move as a cynical manipulation and called for protests.

Mr. Putin, a 67-year-old former KGB officer, has ruled Russia for more than 20 years. After serving for two consecutive four-year terms – a limit outlined in the current version of the constitution – Mr. Putin shifted to prime minister's seat in 2008, with his close ally Dmitry Medvedev becoming a placeholder president.

The length of the presidency was extended to six years under Mr. Medvedev, and in 2012 Mr. Putin returned to the Kremlin as president. In 2018, he was re-elected for another six years. 

Mr. Putin has weathered several international storms during his 20 years in power. The 2014 annexation of the Crimean Peninsula, which prompted a drawn-out, years-long conflict with Ukraine, significantly boosted his approval ratings back at home.

As Moscow's relations with the West soured over the 2014 annexation and more scandals followed, the Kremlin kept Mr. Putin's popularity high by painting Russia as a besieged fortress in need of a strong leader to withstand the outside pressure.

The constitutional reform passed by the Duma on Wednesday would allow Mr. Putin to run for presidency two more times after 2024. Before the national vote, it will be reviewed by Russia's Constitutional Court.

The changes redistribute the executive powers of the Russian government in Moscow and further strengthen the power of the presidency, while also banning same-sex marriage and listing "a belief in God" as one of Russia's traditional values.

The proposal to restart the term clock for the current president was put forward by former Soviet cosmonaut Valentina Tereshkova, now a Duma deputy, during the second reading of the amendments on Tuesday. Following Ms. Tereshkova's speech, Mr. Putin quickly arrived at parliament to address the lawmakers and supported the idea.

The move prompted immediate calls for protests from various opposition groups. On Tuesday night, about 200 people gathered near the Kremlin and lined up to hold solo pickets – the only form of protest in Russia that is legal without prior authorization from the government – against the reform.

"It was clear from the start that it is being done to keep Putin in power forever," opposition activist Alexei Miniaylo, who called for the pickets on his Facebook page on Tuesday, told The Associated Press. "But the brazen manner in which it was done elicited outrage."

Two opposition groups called for a bigger rally in Moscow on March 21 or March 22 and applied for authorization with the city authorities. Soon after, Moscow City Hall announced banning outdoor events with attendance of more than 5,000 until April 10, saying it was part of precautionary steps to prevent the spread of the new coronavirus.

Activists remained unfazed, however, and on Wednesday morning refiled their requests, amending the maximum number of participants from 50,000 to 4,500. "Our position is that if the coronavirus is such a dangerous threat, then they should cancel the vote [on the constitutional reform], as it can expose millions of people to infection," Mikhail Svetov, leader of the Civil Society movement, told the AP. "And if it is not that dangerous, then rallies should be allowed."

Pickets and protests were being organized in other Russian cities as well, said Tatyana Usmanova, an activist with the "No" group formed two months ago to coordinate the opposition effort against the reform.

"It gets to people, because it is totally out of line," Ms. Usmanova said.

Activists and analysts agree, however, that large-scale protests will be harder to organize because of coronavirus fears that are likely to deter people from taking to the streets. 

“People are scared and less prone to gather for large demonstrations,” independent political analyst Kirill Rogov told the AP.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. Francesca Ebel contributed to this report. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.