British lawmakers vote to block 'no deal' departure from EU

Twenty-one members of Prime Minister Johnson's party voted to stop his plan for Britain to leave the E.U. without reaching a deal.

House of Commons/PA/AP
Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson speaks during Prime Minister's Questions in the House of Commons, London, Sept. 4, 2019. Members of Mr. Johnson's party voted against his plan to leave the EU without a deal to alleviate potential economic losses from Brexit.

Britain's Parliament was attempting to defy Prime Minister Boris Johnson's Brexit plans on Wednesday as lawmakers sought a way out of the impasse that has gripped the nation since the 2016 vote to leave the European Union.

The House of Commons was set to confront Mr. Johnson over his insistence that the United Kingdom leave the EU on Oct. 31 even without a withdrawal agreement to cushion the economic blow. Opposition lawmakers, supported by rebels in Johnson's Conservative Party, planned to fast-track a law that would block a no-deal departure, amid cries from lawmakers that it would cause irreparable harm.

"To deliver Brexit like this is to create a poison pill which for 40 years will divide this country straight down the middle," former Conservative Party leadership candidate Rory Stewart told the BBC. "If you are going to deliver Brexit at all, try to do it legally, constitutionally and with consent."

Mr. Johnson accused his opponents of undermining the government's attempt to strike a new divorce deal with the EU, and said he would seek a general election if the lawmakers succeed this week, taking his message directly to the people in his bid to deliver Brexit come what may.

On Wednesday Mr. Johnson said the opposition's "surrender bill" would "wreck any chance" of Britain concluding successful negotiations with the EU.

He said that if the bill passed he would call for "a general election on October 15."

But it is unclear whether Mr. Johnson has the votes to trigger an election, which needs the approval of two-thirds of the 650 House of Commons lawmakers.

The main opposition Labour Party said it would oppose an election until legislation is in place to block a no-deal Brexit. The party's spokesman on Brexit issues, Keir Starmer, said Mr. Johnson had violated the trust of the House of Commons with his decision last week to suspend Parliament for several weeks before the Brexit deadline.

Mr. Johnson needs the support of Labour to win Parliament's backing for an election.

"He has zero trust, because I'm afraid he has been dishonest time and again," Mr. Starmer told the BBC.

While Mr. Johnson insists that talks with the EU are "making substantial progress," the bloc says the U.K. has not submitted any substantial new proposals.

Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn accused Mr. Johnson of frittering away time until a no-deal Brexit became inevitable.

"These negotiations are a sham. All he is doing is running down the clock," Mr. Corbyn told lawmakers in the House of Commons.

On Tuesday, Mr. Johnson lost his first vote in Parliament since becoming prime minister in July, as lawmakers passed a motion enabling their push for a law stopping a no-deal Brexit. His government lost its working majority as one Conservative lawmaker defected to the opposition, and more than 20 Tory legislators sided with the opposition on the no-deal vote.

Mr. Johnson responded with swift vengeance, expelling the rebels from the Tory group in Parliament, leaving them as independent lawmakers. Among those bounced out were Mr. Stewart; Nicholas Soames, the grandson of Winston Churchill; and Kenneth Clarke, a former treasury chief and the longest-serving member of the House of Commons.

The beleaguered U.K. leader received a boost Wednesday when a Scottish court refused to intervene in his decision to suspend Parliament. A Scottish judge ruled that it was a matter for lawmakers to decide, rather than the courts.

The case was only the first of several challenges to Mr. Johnson's maneuver, however.

Transparency campaigner Gina Miller, who won a ruling in the Supreme Court in 2017 that stopped the government from triggering the countdown to Brexit without a vote in Parliament, has another legal challenge in the works – set to be heard Thursday. A human rights campaigner has sued in Northern Ireland, arguing that the historic Good Friday accord that brought peace is in jeopardy because of Mr. Johnson's actions.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. Gregory Katz contributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to British lawmakers vote to block 'no deal' departure from EU
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today