Geoffroy Van Der Hasselt/AP
Luxembourg's Prime Minister Xavier Bettel (c.) speaks with European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker (l.) at an EU summit in Brussels, June 30, 2019. European Union leaders failed to fill a half dozen of jobs at the top of the EU, including Commission president.

EU summit suspended over leadership stalemate

After a full night of negotiations, European leaders failed to agree on new candidates for some of the EU's top jobs. With talks suspended for a day, many worry that the impasse may signal gridlock. 

Almost a full day after sitting down to pick candidates for the European Union's prime political posts, weary EU leaders broke off their talks Monday amid deep divisions over who should run the European project for at least the next five years.

After a full night of one-on-one meetings, trilateral talks, and group discussions – including sitting down over breakfast – EU Council President Donald Tusk called a halt, and said the summit should reconvene at 11:00 a.m. local time (5:00 a.m. ET) on Tuesday.

French President Emmanuel Macron lamented the meeting as a "failure," and said the summit "gives an image of Europe that is not serious" due to the stalemate.

This failure, he said, should lead to "deep changes" to how the European Union operates.

Already beset by crises over Brexit and damaging infighting over how best to manage migrant arrivals, the EU's 28 leaders had been keen to show there is still life in the European project with quick decisions on a series of top-notch nominations for what are key portfolios.

But their failure, yet again, to agree on any names highlights Europe's changed political landscape following May's elections to the European Parliament, which saw the two historically dominant center-right and -left groups lose seats to the far-right and populists, as well as to pro-business and pro-environment parties.

Rather than make Europe more efficient, the results seem to have complicated matters further.

"It will continue," Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte told reporters after the summit broke off, and leaders left, many without saying much to reporters.

"It's a bit complicated," he said, after more than 17 hours of official deliberations, plus hours of sideline meetings.

No news conference are planned to explain exactly how the summit had broken down.

The aim had been to pick at least three of five top jobs up for renewal, most of them by November. Prime among them is the post of president of the EU's powerful executive arm, the European Commission, currently held by Jean-Claude Juncker, and the president of the European Council, where incumbent Mr. Tusk chairs summits and helps set the EU's political agenda. Other jobs include the president of the European Parliament and the EU's foreign policy chief – essentially its top diplomat, responsible for among other things the Iran nuclear deal.

The European Central Bank chairman's job was to be decided later.

After a night of talks that started Sunday afternoon, it had all appeared on track by mid-morning Monday. As some reporters slumped asleep over their desks, a high-ranking diplomat involved in the deliberations said that former Dutch foreign minister Frans Timmermans was favorite to become the next president of the European Commission, which proposes and enforces EU laws, with policy commissioners who supervise policy on everything from national budgets to migration, from competition issues to health.

The diplomat spoke on condition of anonymity because the leaders hadn't reconvened for formal talks where they were expected to confirm the jobs.

Over what has been one of the longest summits in recent years – surpassing even the record set during the Greek debt crisis – Bulgaria's Kristalina Georgieva from the center-right European People's Party (EPP) group looked likely to follow Mr. Tusk as head of the European Council, which coordinates policies of member states and organizes summits.

An EU official later said that Ms. Georgieva was part of the reason for the holdup, and it remained unclear whether she would get a green light. The official asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the talks.

Others in line for top jobs were pro-business liberals Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel or the current EU competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager from Denmark as foreign policy chief – essentially the bloc's top diplomat. The leading EPP candidate Manfred Weber appeared in line to serve at least half a term as president of the European Parliament, the diplomat said.

The aim is to fill the posts respecting political affiliations, geography – a balance of countries from Europe's North and South, East and West – population size, and gender considerations. But the wrangling is yet another sign of the way that EU elections in May – which saw the two mainstream parties lose seats in the European Parliament – have shaken up Europe's political landscape.

As she left, German Chancellor Angela Merkel tried to play down the impasse, saying it's worth spending a little more time to achieve as broadly accepted an agreement as possible.

Ms. Merkel said the leaders put off their quest to fill the top posts because there were "big member states that couldn't live ... with the proposals we had today." She didn't offer details.

She suggested that, while it would be technically possible to outvote countries with a total of 100 million inhabitants, it would be unwise. Ms. Merkel said that "politics is attempting to implement what is possible, and sometimes that takes time."

"If we rushed things now ... and then lived with insurmountable tensions in the European Council for five years, we would be asked: 'Why couldn't you take one more day, and sleep on it for one night, and look again to see whether there is a new point of view?'"

This story was reported by The Associated Press. Associated Press writers Mike Corder, Geir Moulson in Berlin, and Angela Charlton in Paris contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to EU summit suspended over leadership stalemate
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today