UK scrambles to break 'political paralysis' over Brexit

After two failed attempts by Prime Minister Theresa May to get Parliament to vote on her proposed exit from the European Union, the speaker of the House of Commons is now requesting something "fundamentally different," and more time to make a deal. 

Alastair Grant/AP/File
Speaker of the House of Commons, John Bercow, delivers an address in Westminster Hall on March 22, 2018 in London. Mr. Bercow said on March 18, 2019 that British lawmakers need a 'fundamentally different' Brexit deal before they vote again.

The British government was preparing Tuesday to ask the European Union for a delay of at least several months to Brexit after the speaker of the House of Commons ruled that Prime Minister Theresa May cannot keep asking lawmakers to vote on the same divorce deal that they have already rejected twice.

Speaker John Bercow's ruling was a potentially fatal blow to Ms. May's Brexit deal with the EU. She had hoped to win over opponents and bring it back to Parliament this week, before a summit of the 28-nation bloc in Brussels on Thursday and Friday.

If the deal was approved, Ms. May had planned to ask the bloc for a short "technical extension" in order for Parliament to pass the necessary legislation for Britain's departure.

But after Mr. Bercow's bombshell declaration that Parliament can only vote again if the deal is "fundamentally different," Ms. May faces the prospect of requesting a much longer delay.

Ms. May has warned opponents that a failure to approve the agreement would mean a long, and possibly indefinite, delay to Britain's departure from the EU.

It could also mean Britain crashing out of the bloc next week without a deal, even though Parliament has voted to rule out that option.

By law, the U.K. will leave the EU on March 29, deal or no deal, unless it secures a delay from the bloc. Withdrawing without a deal could mean huge disruption for businesses and people in the U.K. and the 27 remaining EU countries.

"If there is no decision, the date of March 29 comes and then it's a 'no-deal,' " said French European affairs minister Nathalie Loiseau.

"For the British to decide nothing is to decide on a 'no-deal.' "

Ms. Loiseau said U.K. lawmakers "have said no to a 'no-deal' and they have said no to a realistic deal. They have to change their mind on one of the two options."

EU leaders are intensely frustrated with Britain's political paralysis, and say they will only grant an extension if U.K. politicians break their deadlock and decide what kind of Brexit they want.

"I expect clear and precise proposals of the British government," said Germany's European affairs minister, Michael Roth.

"We are really exhausted by these negotiations," Mr. Roth said at a meeting with his EU counterparts in Brussels ahead of the leaders' summit.

The British government, meanwhile, signaled that it has not given up on Ms. May's deal, and could try to bring it back to Parliament next week if it can win over enough opponents.

Brexit Secretary Stephen Barclay said that despite Mr. Bercow's ruling, the deal could be voted on again if "the circumstances have changed."

"The fact that a number of members of Parliament have said that they will change their votes points to the fact that there are things that are different," he told Sky News.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. Lorne Cook reported from Brussels. Danica Kirka also contributed from London.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.