Kosovo president wants to redraw border with Serbia to ease tensions

Kosovo – which is not recognized by nations including Serbia and Russia – is calling to "correct" its border with Serbia, incorporating part of Serbia. The Balkan nations have made little progress on normalizing relations since agreeing to do so in 2013 as a prerequisite for EU membership. 

Laura Hasani/Reuters
Kosovo President Hashim Thaci speaks during interview in Pristina, Kosovo, on August 14, 2018. Mr. Thaci is proposing Kosovo's border be redrawn to include parts of Serbia with a majority Albanian population. He says the change would help end persistent tensions between Serbia and his country.

A redrawing of the border to bring parts of Serbia with a majority Albanian population into Kosovo could end persistent tensions between Serbia and Kosovo and allow both nations to move towards EU membership, Kosovo's president said on Tuesday.

Hashim Thaci told Reuters in an interview that he would present his plan to Serbia's President Aleksandar Vucic when they meet in September in Brussels as part of a dialogue sponsored by the European Union.

Normalizing bilateral relations is a key condition for both Serbia and Kosovo to advance towards their eventual goal of EU membership. The Balkan neighbors agreed in 2013 to resolve all pending issues but have so far made little progress.

"Definitely now is the moment to correct the border between Kosovo and Serbia, which is around 400 kilometers [250 miles] long," Mr. Thaci said.

"This would help avoid inter-ethnic problems and creating any sort of autonomous region such as the Serb Republic [in Bosnia]," he added.

Thaci did not say what Serbia might receive in return for giving up such territory – home to about 55,000 ethnic Albanians – and rejected any partition of Kosovo along ethnic lines.

"Correcting borders will definitely avoid Kosovo's partition, swapping territories, more crises or problems, or even possibly a new war," he said.

'EU perspective'

Kosovo, whose population of 1.8 million is mainly ethnic Albanian, declared independence from Serbia in 2008, a decade after NATO bombed rump-Yugoslavia to end the killing of Albanian civilians by Serb forces during a two-year insurgency.

It is now recognized by more than 100 nations but not by Serbia, Russia, and five EU states. Serbia and Russia have blocked Kosovo from joining the United Nations.

Some Serbian media and politicians have suggested redrawing the border to bring a part of northern Kosovo populated mainly by Serbs into Serbia and in return to give parts of southern Serbia with an Albanian majority to Kosovo.

Around 100,000 Serbs live in Kosovo, half of them north of the Ibar River in towns where they form a majority. The rest lives south of the river in areas with an Albanian majority.

A majority of the Serbs living in Kosovo do not recognize that country's institutions and still regard Belgrade, Serbia, as their capital.

Mr. Vucic suggested last week he was prepared to compromise on defining Serbia's borders with Kosovo, though observers say the two sides remain far apart. Most Serbs view Kosovo as the cradle of their nation and Orthodox Christian faith.

Western countries are also uneasy about any redrawing of borders in the Balkans.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Monday that the territorial integrity of Western Balkan states was "sacrosanct."

The British embassy in Pristina, Kosovo, said "calls for redrawing national borders could be destabilizing."

But Thaci said he was confident that Western countries would support any agreement signed between him and Vucic, which he believes can be reached by February 2019.

"If the parties agree in the process of the dialogue and they reach an agreement, the EU and the United States will support any deal on border correction," Thaci said. "We are following a peaceful process and this will avoid problems, avoid crises, and will open an EU perspective for both countries." 

This story was reported by Reuters. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.