Germany's Merkel wants to roll up the EU welcome mat for Turkey

German Chancellor Angela Merkel voiced her opposition for Turkey's accession talks, citing President Erdogan's recent crackdown and Turkey's shift away from the EU in recent months. But not all EU leaders agree. 

Osmal Orsal/Reuters
The Turkish and EU flags fly side by side in Istanbul, Turkey.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel's call to stop Turkey's European Union accession talks drew a mixed response from the bloc's foreign ministers on Thursday, while French President Emmanuel Macron said Ankara remained a vital partner of the EU.

NATO allies Germany and Turkey have traded increasingly bitter words over the last two years. But the EU as a whole has been alarmed by President Tayyip Erdogan's crackdown on dissent following a botched coup in Turkey in July 2016.

Ms. Merkel announced her toughened stance on Turkey's long-stalled EU bid in a TV debate last Sunday with her main rival in national elections due on Sept. 24.

Arriving at talks with his EU colleagues in the Estonian capital Tallinn, German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel said it was Turkey itself that was moving away from the EU, while Austria's Sebastian Kurz reiterated his line that the talks should end.

But the foreign ministers of Finland and Lithuania spoke out against breaking off the negotiations.

"No, we should continue the process and engagement. It's not easy but we have to value contacts," Lithuania's Linas Linkevicius told reporters.

"By stopping, by cutting, we will not make a good thing because we will encourage them even more to go away. I think the effect would be the opposite than what we'd wish."

Turkey's EU ties minister, Omer Celik, is due to join the bloc's 28 officials for talks in Tallinn later on Thursday.

Migration concerns

The French president told Greece's Kathimerini newspaper that ties with Turkey should be maintained even if the country had strayed from the EU path.

"Turkey has indeed strayed away from the European Union in recent months and worryingly overstepped the mark in ways that cannot be ignored," he said.

"But I want to avoid a split because it's a vital partner in many crises we all face, notably the immigration challenge and the terrorist threat."

A senior Turkish official said EU states must decide whether they wanted Turkey as a member, but there was a sense "they no longer want the marriage ... [but] want cohabitation."

The EU is eager to preserve a deal that has stemmed the mass migration via Turkish territory of people from conflict areas. Turkey has in the past questioned the EU's sincerity in keeping its side of the arrangement.

"We have to tread very carefully and, while discussing Turkey's status as a candidate country, we should also discuss the future relationship in all its aspects," Estonia's Sven Mikser said in Tallinn.

He said he did not expect the EU to make any formal decision this year, adding that the bloc needed to cooperate with Ankara on migration and security in particular.

Bert Koenders of the Netherlands said he agreed with Germany's call to also stop separate talks on upgrading the EU's customs union with Turkey but suggested Berlin's stance would only become clear after the parliamentary vote later this month,

"We will have to see what happens," Mr. Koenders said. "After the German elections will be the time for more discussions on this."

This story was reported by Reuters. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Germany's Merkel wants to roll up the EU welcome mat for Turkey
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today