Obama for president – of France?

A grassroots campaign is seeking a million signatures to draft the former US president to run for president of France.

Susan Walsh/AP Photo/File
French President Francois Hollande (l.) answers a question with former President Barack Obama at the G-8 Summit at Camp David, Md., in May 2012. A new grassroots campaign is collecting one million signatures to convince Obama to run for president in France.

Apparently American Democrats are not the only ones missing Barack Obama. Some citizens of France have launched a new grassroots campaign called "Obama17" that is seeking 1 million signatures in the next three weeks, to convince the former US President to run for president in France.

Amid a presidential election marked by scandals and surprises, the organizers hope the campaign, though not serious, could be a voice for the people calling for change – just as many other campaigns have done before.

“It's definitely a joke," one of the co-creators of the website told NPR on Thursday, preferring not to use his name to avoid legal consequences. “But it could make people think a little bit about what we could do differently in French politics.… The idea was to make people wake up."

The campaign, with posters plastered around Paris, has a slogan of “Oui on peut” – the French translation of Mr. Obama’s famous 2008 presidential campaign slogan “Yes we can” – has already garnered some 35,000 signatures, according to their Facebook page. At least two other petitions with similar goals were also started last year, though not as successful as the current one.

For the creators of the website, this push for Obama’s leadership reflects a desire for another choice, even an impossible one, driven by their frustration with the current political climate in France.  

"We were thinking about French politics and saying that we were fed up with the fact that we all the time had to vote against someone, and how it would be cool to be able to vote for someone we admire,” he told NPR. “We came up with Obama."

While Obama has no real chance of winning the May election – among other obstacles, he is not a French citizen and does not speak French – he is very popular in France. A global attitude survey in June from the Pew Research Center found that 84 percent of the French had confidence that Obama would "do the right thing regarding world affairs," while 9 percent expressed similar confidence in then-candidate Donald Trump and 71 percent in Hillary Clinton.

But Obama’s appeal goes deeper. His election as the first African-American president “had a galvanizing effect in Europe, particularly among French minorities,” reported The Christian Science Monitor’s Robert Marquand in 2009. “The Obama effect” encouraged many French citizens of color to run for office, challenging a status quo that had only 7 minority members of either the Assembly or Senate, which together have 860 seats.

The creators of the Obama17 may have been inspired by the US tradition of protest candidates who, without any hope of winning, nonetheless launched their campaigns to make some political points. For instance, bowing to pressure from fans, comedian Stephen Colbert declared his brief candidacy for "President of South Carolina" in October 2007.

"The French are ready to make a radical choice," says the Obama17 website. "That's good, because we have a radical idea to propose."

After listing his qualifications, including "the best resumé in the world," they conclude their pitch by saying, "At a time when France is about to vote massively for the far right, we can give the planet a lesson in democracy by electing a foreigner as French president."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.