Dutch PM tells migrants to 'Behave normally or go away'

Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte sought to draw votes from his far-right opponent with a full-page newspaper ad that said that immigrants engaging in antisocial behavior should leave.

Ruben Sprich/Reuters
Mark Rutte, Prime Minister of the Netherlands attends the World Economic Forum annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

In an open letter published in several newspapers on Monday, the prime minister of the Netherlands gave immigrants who “refuse” to integrate into Dutch society two options: “Behave normally or go away.”

But observers view the message Mark Rutte repeated in an interview with the Algemeen Dablad newspaper published the same day as less about enforcing social norms and more about luring voters from the the prime minister’s populist far-right opponent who is currently ahead in the polls.

Mr. Rutte’s layered immigration message on Monday also shows the pressure European leaders are under as the “super elections” between incumbents and populist opponents nears. The election in the Netherlands on March 15 will be the first in three countries to see politicians who represent European unity face off against anti-immigrant Euroskeptics, as Sara Miller Llana reported for The Christian Science Monitor.

“The three upcoming elections will test just how powerful populist forces have become in key European nations,” wrote Ms. Llana, mentioning the Netherlands, France, and Germany. “The far right has grown in force in each of these countries, coupling anti-immigrant and anti-European Union sentiment. Yet there are still more politicians who support the European project than don’t, and more people who think the EU is a positive thing than negative.”

In the open letter that ran as a full-page ad in several newspapers, Rutte acknowledged he shared feelings of frustration for immigrants “who fundamentally reject this country.”

“People who don't want to adapt, [who are] attacking our habits and rejecting our values,” wrote Rutte, “who attack gay people, who shout at women in short skirts, or call ordinary Dutch people racist.”

“I understand the people who think that if you so fundamentally reject our land, I prefer that you leave,” he said. “As it happens I have that feeling too. Act normal or go away.”

He also mentioned “antisocial people who believe they should always have priority. Who dump rubbish on the streets, and who spit on the conductors on the trains and trams.”

But the leader of the center-right People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) said it’s also important not to generalize this frustration against all immigrants.

The solution, he said, is “not to tar everyone with the same brush, or insult or expel whole groups” but to “make it crystal clear what is normal, and what is not normal, in our country. We must actively defend our values.”

The letter didn’t mention Rutte’s far-right opponent for prime minister by name. But Geert Wilders, the leader of the nationalist Freedom Party (PVV), took aim later on Monday at the man he wants to unseat.

He called the prime minister “the man of open borders, the asylum tsunami, mass immigration, Islamization, lies and deception.”

Rutte is seeking to defeat Mr. Wilders and win a third term. He assumed office in 2010, two years after the financial crisis that swept across Europe, and he is credited with steering the Netherlands out of it. But he has seen his popularity slide, with criticisms that include presiding over a “moral crisis,” according to The Guardian.  

Wilders has surged in the polls, with some recent surveys showing support for Wilders' PVV nearly equal to VVD ahead of the vote, as The Washington Post reported. But even if Wilders wins the most seats in the Dutch parliament, he isn’t expected to be able to form a coalition. Mainstream parties have vowed not to enter government with Wilders, who was convicted in December of insulting and inciting discrimination against Moroccans. Wilders is appealing the conviction, which he said is “shameful.”

The election result in the Netherlands could foreshadow results in France and Germany later in the spring and fall, respectively. 

In France, Marine Le Pen of the far-right National Front has gained ground in polls, with a recent Le Monde poll showing her in the lead.

If she wins, “that would put one of Europe’s harshest Euroskeptics at the head of a country that, as a founding member of the EU, is crucial to the bloc’s continued legitimacy,” writes the Montior’s Llana. “Even if populists don’t win upcoming races, they are setting agendas and dividing the bloc just at a time when the EU needs to stand together,” referring to concerns of Russian meddling, the refugee crisis, and the fallout of “Brexit.”

While it’s not Europe’s most stable moment, says Ian Lesser, vice president for foreign policy at The German Marshall Fund of the United States in Brussels, the pressures of 2016 may have served as a wake-up call.

“And there is some good in that,” he says, especially with the busy electoral schedule this year.

“The large presumption was that this simply could not happen,” he says. “Complacency has been profoundly shaken. … Media, policy institutions, and politicians have realized how out of touch they really are, and that they have to get their finger on the pulse of what people are thinking and likely to do.”

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.