Powerful earthquakes rattle central Italy

Strong earthquakes caused injuries and widespread damage, but no fatalities, in central Italy overnight Wednesday.

Max Rossi/Reuters
Firefighters inspect a collapsed building after an earthquake in Borgo Sant'Antonio near Visso, central Italy, Thursday

As officials surveyed the site of earthquakes that hit mountainous central Italy overnight, the general feeling was one of relief.

Two strong earthquakes affected the region, which includes Umbria and Marche, on Wednesday night. The first was a 5.4 magnitude tremor, while the second registered at 6.1, making it eight times stronger. They were followed by a 4.9 magnitude aftershock, and dozens of weaker shocks that went on throughout the night.

Many residents left their homes after the first quake, some fleeing into the pouring rain. Those who could not find shelter elsewhere spent the night in their cars. Their responses, as well as successful restoration efforts following previous earthquakes, have been praised for the limited injuries resulting from the earthquakes.

The quakes come just two months after the August 24 earthquake killed almost 300 people and destroyed several towns in the region. Understandably, residents were somewhat emotionally shaken by the events, with Campi resident Mauro Violo telling Reuters that he “can’t shake off the fear.”

The two quakes do seem to be connected. Massimiliano Cocco from Italy’s National Institute of Geophysics and Vulcanology explained that the August event probably caused these tremors, which have also been described as aftershocks from the previous quake. Because they were so close to the surface, their effect was magnified, according to US Geological Survey seismologist Paul Earle.

But officials emphasize that the fallout from this one is under control. Dozens of people sustained minor injuries and four were seriously hurt, Italy’s Civil Protection Agency said. Yet there are no signs of people trapped in rubble, and no-one seems to have been killed. 

Speaking on state radio, Interior Minister Angelino Alfaro explained that the weaker first quake probably helped save lives, because most people had already left their homes before the stronger second quake hit. It was after the second quake that buildings began to collapse, according to Campi fire department official Rosario Meduri.

Gianluca Pasqui, mayor of Camerino, where the town’s historic bell tower collapsed, pointed to the absence of fatalities as a sign that buildings reconstructed after previous shocks held up well.

“I can say that the city didn’t have victims. That means that even if there is a lot of damage probably the reconstruction in the historic center was done in a correct and adequate manner. Because otherwise, we would be speaking of something else,” Mayor Pasqui told Sky TG24.

With many homes rendered uninhabitable, mayors have expressed concern about housing the predominantly older population of the mountain towns. With the weather getting chillier, tents – used in August – are no longer an option.

Rescue workers prepared a 50-bed quake-proof room in Campi for those who could not stay in their homes, and the mayors are searching for more temporary housing. One option being considered is camper vans, which are less vulnerable to tremors than hotel buildings.

And the government has indicated that financial support may be forthcoming. Interior Minister Alfaro said that a decree that would pay for costs relating to the August quake could be extended to cover Wednesday’s events also. The decree is currently under consideration by Italy’s parliament.

This report includes material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Powerful earthquakes rattle central Italy
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today