With 'resignation' announcement, Chechnya's strongman woos Putin

Coming so soon after a damning report on his despotic reign, Ramzan Kadyrov's declaration that he will not run for reelection may look like political retreat. But it is actually a show for his patron, Putin.

Musa Sadulayev/AP/File
Chechen regional leader Ramzan Kadyrov (c.), wearing a Russian military uniform, attends celebrations in May 2015 marking the 70th anniversary of the victory over Nazi Germany, in Chechnya's provincial capital Grozny, Russia. Chechnya's regional leader says he is willing to step down when his term ends in early April.

When Chechnya's pro-Kremlin strongman, Ramzan Kadyrov, appeared to tender his resignation on Saturday, the Moscow rumor mill went into overdrive.

Just days after a liberal opposition group published a damning report accusing Mr. Kadyrov of corruption, murder, and imposing an unconstitutional dictatorship of sharia law during his eight-year rule, he told a stunned TV interviewer on the weekend that he felt his time at Chechnya's helm was up.

"Now I feel that the country’s leadership should find another person so that my name cannot be used against my fellow people," he said. Instead, he added, he'd like to devote himself to family, business, and the study of Islam.

Experts caution that absolutely none of this should be taken at face value, or viewed through a Western political lens.

They suggest that if Kadyrov is feeling nervous, it is not because of the 65-page report authored by Ilya Yashin, which pulled together a lot of evidence about his brutal rule that has long been known. Rather, it may be due to unseen shifts within the Kremlin, including changes in President Vladimir Putin's inner circle.

In fact, Kadyrov is issuing an ultimatum to Mr. Putin to step in and personally support him for reelection in voting due this September, or risk destabilizing the strongman rule that has kept Chechnya pacified for the past 8 years, they say.

"Kadyrov senses that his position is worsening. There are signs that the Kremlin is unhappy with him, and increasingly the mood in Russia's elite is turning against him due to his unpredictable and reckless behavior. He feels a loss of trust at the top," says Mr. Yashin, whose report drew very little attention in Russia. "Kadyrov has been seeking a personal meeting with Putin for a couple of months now, and Putin doesn't answer. So, Kadyrov is nervous, and keeps sending messages to prove his loyalty. Of course he doesn't want to leave."

Putin's Chechen pact

Putin handed over near-total control to Kadyrov after Russian troops, who had pounded the restive republic into submission, withdrew several years ago. In return, Kadyrov snuffed out local dissent, co-opted former rebels into his private army, and made sure Chechnya was completely loyal to the Kremlin.

The challenge of Chechen rebellion, which had plagued post-Soviet Russia for almost two decades, was "solved" at the cost of empowering a despot whose constant and sometimes brutal antics would repeatedly embarrass Putin.

Among other things, Kadyrov has been accused of supporting his opulent personal lifestyle by embezzling aid money pumped in by Moscow to rebuild the war-shattered republic, terrorizing Chechen women who resist a strict Islamic dress code, and threatening Russian law enforcement officials who try to track down criminals in Chechnya. Most ominous of all has been a string of murders of political opponents, from local human rights activists to Russian liberal leader Boris Nemtsov, that could be traced to Kadyrov's regime.

For several months now, Kadyrov has been threatening Russia's small band of liberal opponents, calling them "jackals," "enemies of the people," and other epithets that recall the language of Stalinist political terror. Last month he posted a video of opposition leader and former prime minister Mikhail Kasyonov, that appeared to have been shot through a gunsight.

This is particularly chilling for Russia's dwindling band of liberals because of the long list of political assassinations in post-Soviet Russia whose organizers are almost never identified but that the trigger men are usually Chechens.

"Kadyrov's Chechnya is a zone of unintended consequences for Russia," says Andrei Kolesnikov, an expert with the Moscow Carnegie Center. "Sure it's been pacified. But it's an utterly brutalized place after two wars, filled with people who grew up with the gun and who have no qualms about killing."

'An audience of one'

Another outspoken Kremlin critic, Andrei Piontkovsky, fled Russia last week after Chechnya's Kadyrov-run legislature demanded he be investigated for "extremism" over an article he wrote about the links between Kadyrov and the Kremlin.

Mr. Piontkovsky, in an email, said that Kadyrov's harassment of liberal critics is aimed at convincing Putin that he is an indispensable ally, not only as ruler of Chechnya but against opponents on the wider Russian stage as well.

"Kadyrov knows that many in [Russian law enforcement] hate him and his base in the Kremlin is only Putin personally," he said. "Hence, his campaign against dissidents is addressed to an audience of one, to please Putin, to demonstrate Kadyrov's loyalty and his usefulness."

The Chechen leader's offer to resign puts Putin on the spot, and may compel him to make a public show of backing Kadyrov. Since Kadyrov runs Chechnya with an iron fist, he can expect to triumph in September's election, so the issue is entirely about securing Putin's personal support amid Kremlin shifts that so far remain invisible to observers, say experts.

"What we're seeing here is the launch of Kadyrov's reelection campaign," says Alexei Mukhin, director of the independent Center for Political Information in Moscow. "There's only one vote he needs to win, and that's it's all about."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to With 'resignation' announcement, Chechnya's strongman woos Putin
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today