Could Dublin tax protests break the dam of Irish politics?

Tens of thousands of Dubliners took to the streets yesterday to express anger over the proposed water tax. It's just the latest in a string of austerity moves that have put voters on edge. 

Peter Morrison/AP
Thousands of protesters congregate in Dublin city center, Ireland, on Wednesday to demonstrate against a proposed new water tax.

Tens of thousands of protesters are a rarity on the streets of Dublin. And when they have come out to demonstrate, the issue is traditionally more exciting than taxes.

Yesterday's protest, in cold, gray, windy, and wet weather, was ostensibly against a proposed water tax. In reality, the Irish anger was much broader and aimed at the policy behind the tax: five years of austerity mandated by the European Union

The peaceful demonstration had a distinctively anti-establishment feel. The “Right2Water” campaign groups a coalition of trade unions, Irish republican party Sinn Féin, and Ireland’s far left. Police estimated 30,000 people turned up, though organizers say 100,000. Either way, the streets of Dublin were packed, with many unable to get close to the stage to hear the speeches and performers, while traffic was backed-up well into the evening. 

Since the 2008 recession, Ireland has seen tax hikes, new income taxes, a new property tax and more, all part of the economic remedies ordered by the so-called “troika” of the EU, European Central Bank, and International Monetary Fund. And the mainstream parties that have implemented those taxes, have suffered accordingly. The popularity of the governing Fine Gael and Labor parties is near all-time low figures, with Labor, which traditionally draws support from trade unions, facing decimation. Ireland’s previous governing party, Fianna Fáil, has stabilized but not recovered.

The proposed water tax, part of the government’s plan to balance its books, ignited not only significant protest, but also inspired a widespread campaign of non-payment. Authorities say the tax is also needed in order to invest in an antiquated water network and as an environmental conservation measure.

But with the troika no longer directing economic policy, Irish lawmakers are now more vulnerable than ever to public pressure. Opposition politicians have called for a snap election. While that is highly unlikely, the government nonetheless has backtracked on the water tax, reducing the planned charges by almost 50 percent – the first significant policy climbdown by the coalition that took power in 2011.

The party that might benefit most from the anger is Sinn Féin, a one-time fringe party that now polls ahead of its rivals. However, a plurality of voters say they support “independents and others,” a group that includes the small socialist parties and independents of left and right alike. 

If a snap election were held and followed those numbers, it would be a watershed moment for Irish politics. A parliament elected according to recent poll figures would be Euroskeptical for the first time since Ireland joined the EU. And with the longstanding "two and a half party" system of Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael, and Labor shattered, it would be more divided along left-right lines than at any time since independence. It may also be a lot less stable, given the sway of independents pushing local issues. 

Some commentators have argued this would force Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael, the two broadly center-right rivals that have dominated Irish politics, to work together for the first time since they emerged from the Irish Republican Army in the 1920s.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.