To Cuba, with love: Russia said to be reopening Havana listening post

Russian experts say that reopening the Lourdes post, closed since 2001, will let Moscow 'watch the entire Western Hemisphere' and is meant to tweak the US.

Alejandro Ernesto/Pool/AP
Cuba's President Raul Castro (r.) talks to the press as Russia's President Vladimir Putin listens in Revolution Palace in Havana on Friday. According to Russian media, the Kremlin plans to reopen their Soviet-era intelligence center in Lourdes, Cuba, after a 13-year absence.

The Russians are coming back to Cuba.

After a 13-year absence, Russia will be reviving the former USSR's biggest overseas intelligence-gathering base, at Lourdes, Cuba, barely 100 miles from the Florida coast, the major Moscow daily Kommersant reported Wednesday.

Russian experts say that while surveillance technology has moved on since the listening post was closed in 2001, and a lot of snooping is done via the Internet these days, location still matters. Lourdes, a sprawling 28-square mile facility in a Havana suburb, opened in 1962. It once housed 3,000 Soviet intelligence specialists who tracked air and sea movements throughout the Western Hemisphere, monitored space launches from Cape Canaveral, intercepted telephone and radio signals, and even kept track of TV broadcasts.

In 1993, then-Cuban Defense Minister Raul Castro claimed that Lourdes accounted for "75 percent of Russia's strategic-military information about the US."

According to Kommersant, the deal to reopen the facility had been under negotiation for months, but was finalized last Friday when Vladimir Putin visited Havana on the first leg of a major Russian charm offensive in Latin America. Among other things, Mr. Putin announced a write-off of about 90 percent of Cuba's $32 billion Soviet-era debt and reportedly inked important economic contracts, including concessions for Russian oil companies to drill off Cuba's coast.

Another reported bargain would enable Russia to position base stations in Cuba for its trouble-plagued Glonass global positioning system, which is seen as a rival to the US-run GPS network. Russia has complained that Washington's refusal to host any Glonass stations on US territory amounts to unfair competition, and part of Putin's brief on his current trip to Latin America is reportedly to find alternative sites in Cuba, Nicaragua, and Brazil.

But the plan to resurrect Lourdes implicitly projects Russian military power once again into the US backyard after a lengthy absence.

"Lourdes is very well located. We'll reopen this facility within six months, and from it we will be able to watch the entire Western Hemisphere," says Anatoly Tsyganok, an expert at the independent Moscow Institute for Political and Military Analysis. "No wonder the Americans are anxious about this."

Cutbacks and goodwill

It was Putin who elected to close Lourdes, along with Russia's only other foreign listening post at Cam Ranh Bay in Vietnam, for reasons the Kommersant article describes as a mixture of financial cutbacks and desire to express goodwill toward the US. The Russian media insists that the US had specifically requested that Moscow shut the Lourdes facility down. In fact, the US House of Representatives did pass a bill in 2000 that mandated an end to loan forgiveness for Russia unless it closed Lourdes, although it was never passed by the Senate and subsequently died.

Kommersant quoted Kremlin sources as saying that "the decision to return to Cuba can be explained by Russia's long strengthened financial capabilities, as well as cooling of relations with the US."

Alexander Konovalov, president of the independent Institute for Strategic Assessments in Moscow, says it's another sign of irreparably deteriorating US-Russia relations.

"In the present atmosphere, with the US threatening Russia with more sanctions, this is a convenient way of saying that we will not take that lying down," he says. "The message is that we can strike back, even in asymmetric ways. The US does something to damage our national interests, so we find ways to retaliate – even if it's largely symbolic – that will be heard loud and clear in Washington."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.