Spain protests, but not too much, over NSA spying

The revelations that the National Security Agency collected some 60 million Spanish communications in a month are just the latest involving America's European allies.

Juan Medina/Reuters
A man holds a banner outside the foreign ministry during a meeting of US ambassador in Spain, James Costos, with Spain's European Secretary of State in Madrid, October 28, 2013. The banner reads 'The US spies and steals from us.'

Spain’s government demanded answers on Monday concerning new information that the US National Security Agency had been intercepting and monitoring millions of phone calls in Spain.

But experts say that Madrid's reaction to the latest revelation of American spying on European allies is notably muted, particularly in comparison to France and Germany.

A report in the newspaper El Mundo, which said the US agency had collected 60 million communications in a month-long period ending early January, prompted the government to summon the US ambassador to lodge a diplomatic protest. The report was co-authored by Glenn Greenwald, an American journalist who has been a conduit for materials collected by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.  

Similar recent revelations have stoked anger with longstanding US allies in Europe. On Sunday, German media aired new details of the depth of the NSA's spying in Germany, reporting that US President Barack Obama has been briefed three years ago on the NSA’s surveillance of German Chancellor Angela Merkel. That report, in Bild am Sontag, was followed by an article in Der Spiegel that said Merkel was first put under surveillance by the NSA in 2002.

In Madrid, Spain’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement that it had asked the US to provide “all the necessary information” on any alleged spying activities “that if confirmed, are improper and unacceptable among partners and friendly countries.”

US Ambassador James Costos, meanwhile, was summoned to meet with Spain’s undersecretary for European affairs, Iñigo Méndez de Vigo, on Monday, while Foreign Minister José Manuel García Margallo was out of the country.

But despite the official protestations, José Ignacio Torreblanca, a senior policy fellow in the European Council on Foreign Relations, says that the tenor of the Spanish government’s reaction has been relatively muted, particularly compared to that of Germany.

“Unlike what’s happening elsewhere, where public opinion and media have mounted pressure, it doesn’t appear that the government is concerned or that people are leaning toward anti-Americanism,” Mr. Torreblanca says.

Spanish privacy laws were as strict as its European counterparts, but most Spaniards have long accepted state prying in exchange for security, he points out.

“Naturally, without making it personal, it’s hard to get excited over this,” Torreblanca says. “Spaniards don’t share the sense that their national security has been compromised.”

Spain’s intelligence services have a long history of collaboration with the US, working with US agencies, for example, monitoring the growth of Al Qaeda-linked terror groups in the West African region known as the Maghreb. US forces base part of their counterterrorism and eavesdropping hardware for North Africa in Spain.

Spanish citizens have also been preoccupied lately with domestic political scandals, the economy and domestic unemployment which is one of the highest in Europe.

After his meeting with Spanish officials, Ambassador Costos said in a statement that US surveillance programs “have played a critical role in protecting citizens of the United States. They have also played an instrumental role in our coordination with our allies and in protecting their interests as well.”

“We will continue to confer with our allies, such as Spain, through our regular diplomatic channels to address the concerns that they have raised. Ultimately, the United States needs to balance the important role that these programs play in protecting our national security and protecting the security of our allies with legitimate privacy concerns,” the ambassador’s statement said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.