First pirates, now junkies? Russia to up charges against Greenpeace.

Russian authorities say that some of the 30 activists arrested for trying to board an oil platform will face drug offenses in addition to piracy charges.

Jacky Naegelen/Reuters
Greenpeace activists install banners on the front wall of Gazprom headquarters in Paris today. The protest is against Gazprom's plans to drill for oil in the Arctic, and also to demand the release of the 28 Greenpeace activists and two journalists detained in Russia.

It increasingly appears that Russia intends to make a very harsh example of 30 Greenpeace activists arrested last month for attempting to hang an environmental banner on a huge offshore oil drilling platform in the Barents Sea that's owned by the state corporation Gazprom-Neft.

The Kremlin's Investigative Committee, Russia's supreme police body, suggested in a statement Wednesday that in addition to facing piracy charges, which carry a maximum 15 year prison sentence, some activists may also be charged with drug offenses.

Investigators searching the captured Greenpeace ship, the Arctic Sunrise, say they have found unspecified articles of "dual purpose" and opiate-based narcotics.

"It is clear that a number of defendants will also be charged with other serious crimes," the statement quotes Investigative Committee spokesman Vladimir Markin as saying.

The 30 people arrested aboard the Greenpeace ship in Russia's economic zone – but not in legal territorial waters – on Sept. 19 include people from 18 different countries, at least one of whom is a journalist.

The issue has led to an escalating diplomatic spat between Russia and the Netherlands over the activities of the Dutch-flagged Arctic Sunrise, with Russia claiming the Dutch government failed to "intervene in the vessel's illegal activities." For its part, the Netherlands has threatened to contest the "illegal" Russian seizure of the ship and its crew at the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in Hamburg.

The Russo-Dutch acrimony reached a peak Tuesday after Moscow demanded an explanation for the weekend arrest and alleged mistreatment of a Russian diplomat in the Netherlands, Dmitry Borodin, who was reportedly suspected by Dutch police of child abuse.

"Russia continues to await exhaustive explanations, if these are even possible, and real apologies from the Netherlands," for ignoring Mr. Borodin's diplomatic immunity, Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said in a statement.

The Dutch foreign ministry released a statement on Wednesday apologizing for the violation of Borodin's immunity, though it noted that "the police officers concerned were acting in accordance with their professional responsibility in responding to a reported situation."

Greenpeace insists that the threatened drug charges against crew members of the Arctic Sunrise are part of a campaign of slander against its activists rather than a genuine legal process. "The Investigative Committee is behaving like a tabloid of the yellow press," says Greenpeace-Russia spokesperson Anton Beneslavsky.

"There are no charges, yet they put out this information without any evidence or facts. Our ship was seized in international waters, and that was illegal. The crew were held on it for five days before being removed. Now investigators say they've searched it and found drugs? There is a complete disregard for all legal procedure on display here," Mr. Beneslavsky says.

Moscow has recently announced plans for major economic development in the Arctic as well as a stepped-up military presence to defend Russia's Arctic stakes.

Some experts say the Russian state corporations Gazprom and Rosneft, which are leading the Arctic economic development scheme, are extremely sensitive about their lack of technological preparation and ecological expertise, and are hence anxious to see a harsh warning meted out to environmentalists who want to come snooping on their projects.

"Gazprom has made great efforts to conceal the way it's working on the Arctic shelf. It has outdated equipment, the reliability [of] that platform is unpredictable, the cost of production is high, and the ecological consequences of an accident might be catastrophic," says Stanislav Belkovsky, president of the independent Institute for National Strategy in Moscow.

"That probably explains why Russian law enforcement is prosecuting those Greenpeace activists in such a tough way. They are simply protecting the interests of these big state companies."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.