Is it Malala's moment for the Nobel Peace Prize?

Malala Yousafzai, the teenager shot by the Taliban, is on the short list of potential winners of this year's Nobel Peace Prize, set to be announced on Friday.

B.K. Bangash/AP
A Pakistani customer looks at a newly published book about Pakistani girl Malala Yousafzai at a local bookshop in Islamabad, Pakistan, Tuesday, Oct. 8, 2013.

The Nobel Peace Prize is tipped to break new ground this year by possibly going to the youngest ever recipient: 16-year-old Malala Yousafzai, who survived an assassination attempt by the Taliban.

According to Kristian Harpviken at the Peace Research Institute and historian Asle Sveen, two Norwegian experts on the prize, the Pakistan schoolgirl tops their shortlist of nominees to be named the winner on Friday. Mr. Harpviken believes she deserves the award for being a symbol of girls' rights to education and security and her fight against extremism and oppression.

Malala has been speaking out against the Taliban’s efforts to ban education for girls in the Swat Valley since 2008 at the age of only 11. She had been blogging for BBC Urdu Services and participating in the Institute for War and Peace Reporting’s Open Minds Project until near-fatally shot in the head by the Taliban two years ago tomorrow.

Should she win, Malala would set a historical precedent as the youngest recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize after Yemeni journalist Tawakkol Karman, who was age 32 when she shared the prize in 2011 with Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, president of Liberia, and Leymah Gbowee, Liberian peace activist. Malala would also be the third female Muslim laureate ever selected by the Norwegian Nobel Committee.

“There is no age limit for receiving a Peace Prize, but I am one of those who have said it could be a problem,” says Mr. Sveen, who has Malala as his second pick after Congolese gynaecologist Denis Mukwege. “But she has exposed herself so strongly regardless, so it’s not so improbable.”

The teenage nominee has recently gained recognition by Time Magazine as one of the 100 most influential people in 2012, delivered a speech to the UN on her 16th birthday in July, and published her memoir “I am Malala” today. She is slated to attend a reception by Queen Elizabeth II at Buckingham Palace next week – possibly as a Peace Prize winner.

“A Nobel Peace Prize for Malala will not just honor her courage and resolve, but also send a clear message to the Taliban terrorists that the world is watching and will support those who stand up for gender equality and universal human rights that includes the right of education for girls,” said Change.org in its petition to the Norwegian Nobel Committee for nomination, which has received support from several countries.

Sveen has higher hopes that Dr. Mukwege will win, as many feel that the conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo has not gotten enough attention. After decades of civil war, thousands of women have been brutally raped. Mukwege has defied death threats and treated victims of sexual violence at the Panzi Hospital in Bukavu, which he founded in 1999.

Both Malala and Mukwege are among a record 259 valid nominations this year, which included 50 organizations. Other top candidates this year, according to Harpviken and Sveen, include Russian human rights activists Lyudmila Alexeyeva, Svetlana Gannushkina, and Lilya Shibanova.

Among the long shots for this year’s award are imprisoned US citizen and Wikileaks source Bradley Manning and National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden – the latter of whom was nominated after the February deadline – as they might be considered provocative choices for the US, says Sveen.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.