Why a Merkel victory in Germany's elections isn't a sure thing

The chancellor remains immensely popular among the public, but the German electoral system means that she still faces hurdles in this weekend's election.

Top candidates in the upcoming German general election: German Chancellor and head of the Christian Democratic Union Angela Merkel (c.); Peer Steinbrück of the Social Democrat (top l.); Rainer Brüderle of the Free Democratic Party (bottom l.); Jürgen Trittin (top r.) and Katrin Göring-Eckardt (bottom r.) of the Green Party.

Germans overwhelmingly support their current chancellor, Angela Merkel, in her bid for re-election. She polls in popularity at double that of her closest rival, Peer Steinbrück. So the federal elections on Sept. 22 in Germany are yawner, right?

Not necessarily.

Germany's complex electoral system – one that political scientists admit that many Germans don't fully understand – means that theoretically come Sunday, she could lose her post. It's highly unlikely. But what is possible, and looking ever more likely, is that she will be forced to govern in a coalition with Mr. Steinbrück's Social Democratic Party (SPD), even though her conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) has a 15-point advantage, according to most polls. Here are some of the reasons why.

Who is competing Sept. 22?

Unlike in the US, the German chancellor is not directly elected. Rather, it is the parties that compete.

There are nearly 40 participating in the Sept. 22 election, but they must receive five percent of the national vote to be able to enter into the Bundestag, or Germany's lower house. This threshold was established to keep fringe groups out of politics, as happened during the Weimar Republic before World War II.

“Having no stable government with a strong majority that could pass legislation led to the further breakdown of the [Weimar] Republic,” says Jürgen Falter, a professor of political science at Mainz University.

That means that five parties are most likely to capture seats in the lower house. They are: Ms. Merkel's CDU, with its sister Christian Social Union (CSU) of Bavaria, polling at about 40 percent; the SPD, the center-left party that has long competed with the CDU. They are polling at about 25 percent of votes; the market-friendly Free Democratic Party (FDP), with whom Merkel currently has a coalition but which is struggling to meet the 5 percent threshold this election; the Greens, a leftist party that is polling at about 10 percent; and the Left, which is polling at another 10 percent.

Two other parties are thought to have an outside chance at being seated. The Alternative for Germany party, a new euroskeptic party, is polling at about 3 percent, and the Pirate Party, an Internet-freedom group that saw a boost amid the backlash to the NSA spying program in Germany, has seen its numbers at around 4 percent.

So why isn't it obvious that Merkel will win?

The CDU has a 15-point lead ahead of its nearest rival, and it is highly probable that Merkel will become chancellor of Germany for a third term.

But even if the CDU gets 40 percent of votes, it does not have an absolute majority. Thus, it needs to form a coalition to control a majority of seats. Merkel's current partner, the FDP, is flailing; even if it meets the 5-percent threshold, another conservative coalition might not comprise a majority.

“The overwhelming majority of the German population wants to have Angela Merkel as chancellor again, but in Germany you don't vote for a chancellor,” says Carsten Koschmieder, a political science researcher at Berlin's Free University. “It is about which coalition is the strongest, not which party is the strongest.”

How does the process actually work?

Voters cast two votes on the ballot: One is for a leader to represent his or her district, which ensures every region in Germany is represented at the federal level. The second vote is to select a party. This is the decisive vote because it determines the relative strength of each party in the Bundestag, which then votes for a federal chancellor.

The process can get complicated when voters “split” their votes – choosing a leader in their district from one party, and choosing a different party for their second vote. Read more about "overhang mandates" at the Bundestag website.

After the results come in on Sunday, the parties will get to the business of building coalitions. To form one, they must agree to a “treaty,” or contract, by negotiating their future government's platform. Once a working coalition is formed, the president of Germany nominates the chancellor and the Bundestag votes.

What is the most likely outcome then on Sunday?

Since Merkel risks not being able to maintain her current conservative coalition, it is very possible that Germany will have a “grand coalition” between the CDU and SPD. While the two differ ideologically, most notably on taxes and ways to ensure a minimum wage, they have governed together before, including during Merkel's first term. Mr. Steinbrück has said that he'd not govern with the CDU in a coalition, but most political analysts say this is posturing ahead of the elections, and that the two would most likely find a political compromise.

Another mathematical possibility is a coalition between the CDU and the Greens. But many dismiss this scenario outright since the two parties differ so fundamentally on so many policies.

Mathematically, the Greens, the Left, and the SPD might also be able to form a coalition, but many in the SPD have long ruled out governance with the Left; they would lose a great deal of credibility if they did an about-turn.

What does the rise of the Alternative For Germany mean for this race?

While euroskeptic parties have gained ground in Europe, they have not found much space in Germany. But the new Alternative for Germany party, which wants weaker European states like Greece to leave the eurozone, has been rising in the polls.

They were polling at only 2 percent for most of the year until Merkel's finance minister said in August that Greece would likely need another bailout. Their percentages rose to between 3 and 4 percent. That's still under the 5 percent threshold, but they do appeal to conservatives, and thus could “steal” votes away from both the CDU and FDP. They are an unknown entity that could be a game-changer in the election.

“We have no experience in regard to this group,” says Mr. Falter. “We do not know if there is hidden potential that doesn't express itself in public opinion polls.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why a Merkel victory in Germany's elections isn't a sure thing
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today