Norway's premier on the outs, despite healthy economy

Norway has prospered under Jens Stoltenberg, but he is unlikely to win reelection in September.

Mindaugas Kulbis/AP
Norway's Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg listens during a news conference on a trip to Vilnius, Lithuania, Tuesday. Despite Norway's healthy economy, Mr. Stoltenberg is not expected to win reelection in September, as his Labor party is trailing in the polls by some 10 points.

Norway’s prime minister, Jens Stoltenberg, is worried, and not just about the European economic crisis. After ten years of leadership, the Labor premier is tipped to lose reelection this September – despite the healthy Norwegian economy.

The latest polls show the non-socialist block could win a majority of parliamentary seats, with Conservative leader Erna Solberg pegged to most likely lead a coalition government. The Conservative Party is predicted to win 36.2 percent of the votes, with Labor trailing by nearly 10 percentage points at 26.4 percent, according to a poll for Norwegian daily Aftenposten this month.

So what has happened to make Norwegians so disenchanted with the slightly greyer, but still charismatic, socialist premier?

“My challenge is that people are satisfied,” said Mr. Stoltenberg, during his final summer press conference last week at the prime minister’s residence in Oslo. “It’s amazing how little Norway has been affected by the financial crisis up until now.”

The oil-rich country has fared relatively well during the global downturn. Unemployment in Norway is currently only 3.5 percent and the country has maintained high housing prices. But there are “warning lamps” showing that the European crisis will start to be felt in Norway, he said, pointing to waning industrial investments, rising unemployment, falling exports.

He warned that the Conservatives and the Progress Party, the two right-wing parties, would squander the budget and put the country’s economy in jeopardy. The country needed responsible fiscal strategy, not tax cuts. “Now is not the time to experiment,” he said, given the future uncertainty.

But Ms. Solberg countered Stoltenberg’s criticism in a press conference yesterday, highlighting it’s not how much the government spends, but how. She claimed the current Labor-led governing coalition has been fiscally irresponsible the past eight years by letting the country's economy become too oil-dependent and uncompetitive.

“It’s not the euro or EU situation or the economic crisis outside that is a challenge for the Norwegian economy,” said Solberg. “It’s also that we have not used the good times to lift our growth potential.”

The Nordic nation has seen a rise in conservative “blue” voters since the early 1990s, while voter support for the centrist “green” parties has dipped, according to electoral statistics by Bernt Aardal, professor at the Institute for Social Research in Oslo. If the trend prevails, this could be the first time since 1927 that the Conservatives topple Labor’s historical dominance as the largest party in a parliamentary election.

Johannes Berg, a senior research fellow at the Institute for Social Research, thinks this is a real possibility. He believes the prime minister is trying to use the same card that won him a second term in 2009, namely the financial crisis. The problem is that there is not the same sense of urgency as there was back then and that “voter fatigue” has set in.

“If you look at the politics in Norway over the last 20 to 30 years, sitting governments tend to fall after four years, even in good times,” says Bergh. “The last election in 2009 was sort of a deviation for that pattern. The general attitude is that Norway is doing really well.”

“If the Labor Party or the sitting government is going to win, something really major needs to happen.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to