With tax evasion on G8 agenda, Cameron eyes Britain's own havens

Ahead of next week's G8 summit, the UK prime minister hopes to convince leaders of British overseas territories like Bermuda and the Cayman Islands to end their tax-sheltering policies.

Eric Vidal/Reuters/File
Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron arrives last month in Brussels at a European Union leaders summit, where cracking down on tax evasion was a major topic. Mr. Cameron hopes to convince leaders of Britain's various overseas territories, several of which has reputations as tax havens, to sign onto a new accord meant to rein in the practice.

British prime minister David Cameron has been talking up the success of his move to put “aggressive” tax avoidance at the center of the agenda for next week’s G8 summit, which he will host in Northern Ireland.

But can he first clean up the tax havens in his own political backyard?

Tax avoidance was "now being discussed, I suspect, in every boardroom in the world," said Mr. Cameron, who has moved in response to revelations that major companies such as Google and Starbucks have used legal loopholes to slash corporate tax bills in Britain.

But Cameron’s G8 plans to initiate a global crackdown on global tax havens are hampered by lingering doubts about his attempts to reach an agreement with a range of former British colonies and dependencies, whose sleepy remoteness allegedly belies their role as major facilitators for corporate tax avoidance.

Cameron has invited British overseas territories and crown dependencies to London on Saturday in an effort to get them to join a new international convention aimed at closing off multinational firms' cross-border avoidance schemes. Fourteen British overseas territories exist, along with three crown dependencies – the islands of Jersey, Guernsey, and the Isle of Man – which are also self-governing, but differ from the former in terms of their constitutional relationship with London.

But Cameron's chances for success remained uncertain on the eve of the meeting, in part due to Bermudian Premier Craig Cannonier's suggestion earlier this week that the agreement "needed to be adjusted."

Mr. Cannonier played down his earlier comment in a statement issued through Britain’s Foreign Office. "Following misleading reports in the media, I want to clarify that Bermuda is strongly committed to joining the multilateral convention on tax information-sharing,” he said.

Signing up overseas territories such as Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, and the British Virgin Islands – all of which have been cited by critics as among the world’s leading offshore tax havens – is crucial to Cameron’s attempts to take a G8 lead. Doing so would demonstrate that Britain is serious about taking action on its own doorstep against global tax evasion – which campaigners say could be costing more than $3 trillion a year.

It’s a challenging task owing to the nature of the constitutional relationship between Britain and the overseas territories and dependencies, says William Vicek, an academic at Scotland’s University of St. Andrews, whose research has focused on the global governance of financial criminality and offshore financial centers of the Caribbean.

“A situation has evolved whereby determining financial policy and tax policy has pretty much been left to the overseas territories, so in the end I think it’s a matter of how much the OTs [overseas territories] will feel a need to respond to Westminster,” he says.

If push comes to shove, the British government can still ultimately force legislation on the territories, as has been in the case in the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Cayman Islands. The British government also stepped in to resume control of the Turks and Caicos islands in 2009 to deal with the widespread allegations of corruption.

“Westminster retains responsibility for foreign affairs, defense policy, and for what they broadly call ‘good governance,’" Dr. Vicek adds. "So under that umbrella, they can go in and say we are going to clean the house, because you are not cleaning your own house. But there is a hesitancy to do that, because it is pretty much like going after folks with a stick.”

Closer to home, there have also been tensions over the issue as a result of the role of the City of London – the financial district of the British capital – as facilitator of relationships between overseas territories and major companies. For now, however, the personal political capital invested in the issue by Cameron indicates that change is in the offing.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.