Does Sweden have a racial profiling problem?

A police campaign to catch illegal immigrants in the Stockholm subway has spurred debate over racial profiling, after the stops ensnared nonwhite Swedish citizens.

A recent campaign by Stockholm police to crack down on illegal immigrants by racial profiling at the city's subway turnstiles has formed the backdrop to a reignited debate about racism, as Sweden struggles to match a welcoming refugee policy with the task of deporting those who are refused.

Under Swedish law, foreigners are required to carry their passport at all times, and can only be asked for them by police if there is a reasonable suspicion that they have committed a crime.

But despite that restriction, police in the Swedish capital reportedly began conducting stops this year of subway commuters they "suspected of being in Sweden illegally" in an effort to crack down on illegal immigration.

"I had a ticket to be in the subway," Gonzalo Munos, a Swede whose parents are from Chile, told Swedish Television after a police officer had asked him in English to see his ID in the subway. "He said 'I would like to see your passport. You are suspected of being in Sweden illegally.'"

Several parties in Parliament have decried the reported police methods as illegal. "We know that there is structural racism in Sweden," says Christina Höj Larsen, spokeswoman on migration issues for the opposition Left Party. "When the police do these things on political orders, they amplify discrimination."

In the Stockholm subway, Inspector Larsson with the city police, who declined to give her first name, says she has not been ordered to target illegal immigrants. But, she admits, "we do perform ID checks on people suspected of crimes."

And the subway ID checks follow explicit instructions from Justice Minister Beatrice Ask of the Moderate Party to "markedly increase" the number of deportations, a priority for the government over the past five years.

Immigration crackdown

Increasing the number of deportations and streamlining the administrative process surrounding them has been a priority for Sweden's center-right government over the past five years. In that time, the number of police ID checks on foreigners inside the country's borders has gone up 10-fold – from just over 1,000 per year in Stockholm in 2007 to nearly 12,000 last year. 

With the police's subway presence now on the public's radar, even police officers have expressed concerns over a waste of resources, and of racial profiling.

Minister Ask told Swedish Radio she isn't worried by accounts of profiling by appearance, and said in Parliament that anyone who has been refused asylum or residence permit must leave Sweden for the country's system of regulated immigration to work.

"If we are to maintain a migration policy which from a European perspective is one of the most humane, and one of the smartest, those who are denied the right to stay in Sweden have to leave," says Johan Pehrson, migration spokesman for another government coalition party, the Liberals.

Still, the public backlash has caused the police to rethink its approach. In March, the unit responsible for around half of the ID checks on foreigners in Stockholm in January – the city's border police – announced it would stop checking IDs in the subway.

'Blonde and blue-eyed'

The backlash has also sparked a wider debate on the status of illegal immigrants and racial prejudice.

Author Jonas Hassen Khemiri, son of a Tunisian father and Swedish mother, suggested in the daily newspaper Dagens Nyheter that he and Ask "swap skin" to experience other forms of discrimination – he as a female politician and she as a non-white Swede.

In response, Ask told Swedish Television she did understand and condemned oppression on the basis of skin color, citing a stint as an exchange student in the 1970s in Akron, Ohio, where her host family was African-American.

And in an interview with daily Dagens Nyheter, Sweden's Migration Minister Tobias Billström said those who hide refused asylum seekers from authorities aren't "at all blonde and blue-eyed" but rather are "countrymen" of the migrants who exploit them as labor.

Outrage followed, with Twitter users showing their discontent with a customized hashtag. "Not blonde and blue-eyed. Tobias Billström can never be my minister," read a tweet from journalist Maria Georgieva.

Sweden's shifting demographics

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development figures show a steady increase in Sweden's foreign-born population between 2000 and 2010, jumping from about 8 percent of the population to nearly 12 percent.  In 2010, nearly 80,000 foreigners immigrated to Sweden, a number comparable to neighboring Norway but significantly higher than in Denmark and Finland. In 2010 and 2011 the annual number of asylum seekers in Sweden sat between those of the more populous United Kingdom and Germany  although only a third of the 36,000 asylum applications handled by the Swedish Migration Board last year were granted.

By the end of 2011, around 15 percent of Sweden's population was born abroad, an increase of nearly two percent since five years ago, with Finland as the most common country of origin followed by Iraq and Poland.

Such figures, or exaggerations of them, have made up the core rhetoric of the Sweden Democrats, a nationalist party in Parliament since 2010 that formed from racist movements during the 1990s.

Ms. Höj Larsen of the Left Party sees the police's turnstile presence as a tangible result of the debate on immigration issues shifting in recent years.

"As a Dane, I saw the same developments there a number of years ago. The xenophobic party isn't welcomed into party politics as such, but others begin to adopt its ideas and rhetoric. What arises is a clearer distinction between 'us' and 'them'. I did not like that in Denmark, and I do not like it here."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.