Exit polls: Putin will return to presidency in Russia

Exit polls forecast Vladimir Putin to win another term as president of Russia, while his opponents plan to take to the streets this week and beyond.

|
Denis Sinyakov/Reuters
People hold a rally in support of Russia's current Prime Minister and presidential candidate Vladimir Putin in Manezhnaya Square near the Kremlin in central Moscow, Sunday. Exit polls showed Vladimir Putin won a resounding victory in Russia's presidential election.

A third presidential term for Vladimir Putin appears to be done and down. An exit poll by the state-run VTsIOM public opinion center, released after polls closed Sunday night, showed the Russian prime minister winning 58.3 percent of the votes, enough to give him a solid first-round victory and send him back to the Kremlin for six years.

Another exit poll, by the independent Public Opinion Foundation, found that Putin won with 59.3 percent of the votes.

But the mood in Moscow, where Mr. Putin's popularity is low, was anything but celebratory. Opposition leaders were already crying foul and drawing up plans for rolling protests this week against elections they say were unfair in their very essence. In coming days, reports from tens of thousands of independent election monitors will likely hit the Internet, adding fuel to the protests if significant fraud should be uncovered.

Much of downtown Moscow was blocked off by about 40,000 special riot police, who set up barricades and blocked access to main squares with rows of buses, apparently aiming to forestall any opposition attempt to hold the kind of fast-moving flash-mob protests that erupted just after the allegedly fraud-tainted elections in December

Opposition forces will stage a show of strength Monday evening on Moscow's central Pushkin Square, just a five minute walk from the Kremlin, which they expect up to 50,000 people to attend. Some of the more radical leaders, such as anti-corruption blogger Alexei Navalny, argue that it's time to turn the protests from single-event affairs into rolling "Occupy the Kremlin" style tent cities. According to the Moscow Times, Mr. Navalny said Sunday that Putin's re-election can already be judged a fraud, and the popular goal now would be to overturn the result.

"Now it's become obvious that violations that are completely irrefutable are significantly influencing the results of the vote," Navalny said. "Monday everyone should go out on the streets wherever they want," regardless of whether authorities grant permits for the meetings, he said. "We have a right to assemble and it's a citizen's duty to come out and say that we're not happy with what's happened."

The pro-Putin youth group Nashi has pledged to hold its own rallies throughout the city, with the largest to be on Lubyanka Square, just a stone's throw from the Kremlin. If anti-Putin groups fulfill their threat to march to the Kremlin, police might have their hands full keeping the two sides apart.

A new feature in this election was the presence of up to 600,000 volunteer election observers, who were inspired by the upsurge against electoral fraud in recent months to take civic action. Most of them have been specially trained to monitor the approximately 200,000 webcams, worth $300-million, that have been installed in every one of the country's 98,000 polling stations, as the Kremlin's answer to the problem of alleged voting fraud.

"The conditions are difficult to work in, because nobody prepared a space or procedures for observers," says Irina Ryabtseva, an observer in downtown Moscow's polling station No. 175. One problem, she says, is that OMON (riot police) officers were coming in to cast absentee ballots in large numbers – since they had been brought into Moscow for election day duty from other regions – though their documentation was often inadequate.

"This is a big worry, and we need to get some clarification about that," says Ms. Ryabtseva.

At least in a couple of sample downtown polling stations, elderly people tended to say they'd voted for Putin, while many younger people said they never would.

"I voted for Putin, naturally," says German Balitsky, a former mathemetician and pensioner. "Putin is the lesser of evils while the others are just chatterboxes who say what they think people want to hear. Putin may not be the liberal he sometimes pretends to be, but he is a firm man. He failed to defeat corruption before, that's true, but I think he will struggle with it now more than ever."

Many voters complained about the lack of viable choices on the ballot, and some seemed very pessimistic about the future.

"If anything changes after the elections, it will probably be for the worse," says Natalya Serdyukova, a voter. "Under the existing authorities we can't hope for improvements. I fear the chasm between the people and leaders is just growing wider, and there's no way to bridge it. When Putin first came to power he was a different person. But not many people can survive the trial of power. Now I just see [in him] the fear of losing."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Exit polls: Putin will return to presidency in Russia
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2012/0304/Exit-polls-Putin-will-return-to-presidency-in-Russia
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe