Greece lurches closer to collapse

Greece could finally default in March when massive bond payments are due.

Thanassis Stavrakis/AP
Pedestrians pass a closed metro station during a 24-hour strike in Athens, Tuesday. International debt inspectors visit Athens to review the course of Greece's austerity reforms. Unions call for strikes and work stoppages in some sectors in the Greek capital.

Greece, where the eurozone debt crisis started in 2009, seems to be closer to financial collapse than ever. 

While Italy and Spain, both struggling with huge debts themselves, have been able to reassure most investors that they can weather the storm, it is looking more likely that Athens could finally default in March when massive bond payments are due. Some observers think Greece is already beyond redemption.

“In my opinion, Greece has already defaulted,” says Clemens Fuest, an economist at Oxford University and adviser to the German government. He and other economists argue that Greece is unlikely to be admitted back to the financial markets anytime soon and is being kept afloat by bailout money in order to avoid damage to the eurozone. 

His Greek colleague Nikos Vettas from the Athens University of Economics disagrees. “It is still possible to escape this vicious circle if we see decisive action within the next weeks and months,” he says. "Private creditors have to agree swiftly on the haircut procedures, the EU partners to deliver the support needed, the citizens to actively support a reform agenda and the politicians to reach the minimum consensus required for such reforms."

Everything hinges on the second bailout package for Greece, worth €130 billion ($169.5 billion), that was agreed to at a European Union summit in October. Inspectors of the so-called troika – the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the European Central Bank (ECB), and the European Union – arrived in Athens today to monitor Greece's progress cutting public spending and bringing down the budget deficit, two preconditions for receiving additional bailout money.

The country is already receiving loans of €110 billion ($139.5 billion) from a first bailout set up in May 2010.

Earlier in January, Greek Prime Minister Lucas Papademos warned that “without an agreement with the troika and further funding, Greece in March faces an immediate risk of an uncontrolled default.” March 20 is the deadline for €14.5 billion ($18.4 billion) of bonds to be repaid.

But the IMF has doubts about Athens’ ability to meet the troika's requirements. Last week German newspapers quoted an internal IMF memorandum that said that Greece was lagging behind badly with necessary reforms and that the current framework of the bailout would have to be adjusted to the country’s worsening economic situation. 

Greece’s economy shrank by 5.5 percent in 2011, and a further contraction is expected for the current year. Unemployment rose to 17.7 percent, and that number will rise with government plans to cut another 150,000 public sector jobs by 2015.

Athens is also struggling to persuade private creditors to forgive half of the €205 billion ($260 billion) they hold in Greek debt – a vital part of the bailout package known as a haircut. Some banks and a number of hedge funds oppose the deal, apparently speculating they could either recover the whole amount or cash Credit Default Swaps (CDS) in the case of a bankruptcy. 

Talks between the Greek finance ministry and the Institute of International Finance (IIF), which represents Greece’s private creditors, collapsed last week, but are expected to resume within days. Charles Dallara, head of the IIF, told the Financial Times that an agreement was needed by the end of this week in order to avoid a Greek default.

For Hans-Werner Sinn, president of the Munich-based Ifo Institute for Economic Research, the risk of a Greek bankruptcy is the lesser evil compared with a further spreading of the debt crisis within the eurozone. He thinks Greece should leave the euro.

“We can only chose between a short-term risk and a long-term one,” he says. “The long-term risk is beyond imagination.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Greece lurches closer to collapse
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today