Pakistan’s army vowed to avoid politics. Now it’s back in the middle.

|
Fayaz Aziz/Reuters
Supporters of former Prime Minister Imran Khan pray for the politician after the Supreme Court ruled that his arrest on Tuesday was illegal, in Peshawar, Pakistan, May 11, 2023.
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 4 Min. )

The Islamabad High Court granted former Prime Minister Imran Khan bail in an ongoing corruption case Friday, a move experts say could help slow the spread of violent protests across the country. Indeed, it’s been an unprecedented week of attacks against the Pakistani military, which recently vowed to end its political meddling. 

A day before his arrest, Mr. Khan accused a two-star general, Faisal Naseer, by name of plotting to have him killed, a statement that experts say crossed an unspoken line. These allegations, along with the seemingly retributive timing of Mr. Khan’s arrest, incited some Khan supporters to target military installations in nationwide demonstrations that have led to thousands of arrests.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

Mass protests over Imran Khan’s arrest have left a trail of destruction throughout Pakistan, from overturned police cars to smoldering government buildings. But the biggest challenge will be repairing the integrity of the country’s most powerful institutions.

The army is not the only institution coming under fire – Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif reportedly chastised the Supreme Court’s decision to declare Mr. Khan’s arrest illegal, calling the judiciary “an iron shield for Imran Khan” – but the integrity of the armed forces has been questioned most bitterly. 

“There is a rage among people about what has been happening over the last year, not only politically, but also economically,” says Shireen Mazari, a former minister from Mr. Khan’s party, shortly before she was arrested Friday. “And everybody knows that the real power behind decision making ... has been the military.”

Days after former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s sudden arrest unleashed a firestorm of anger and plunged several cities into chaos, Pakistan may have a chance to catch its breath. 

In an unexpected decision Friday, the Islamabad High Court granted Mr. Khan bail and barred his arrest in other registered cases until after the weekend. This comes after supporters took to the streets in a series of violent protests that have targeted both government buildings and military property.

The demonstrations have led to at least eight deaths and thousands of arrests, with some detainees being held illegally without charge. In many places, troops have been deployed to quell the unrest, and services like Twitter and Google have been blocked to stop protesters from mobilizing.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

Mass protests over Imran Khan’s arrest have left a trail of destruction throughout Pakistan, from overturned police cars to smoldering government buildings. But the biggest challenge will be repairing the integrity of the country’s most powerful institutions.

Mr. Khan’s release may help slow the growing protests, say experts, but will likely do little to reverse the damage to the reputation of Pakistan’s most powerful institutions. 

Indeed, this week marks an unprecedented escalation in the showdown between Mr. Khan and the Pakistani military, which has ruled the country from the shadows for decades but vowed late last year to end its political meddling.

Critics say the politician’s arrest at the hands of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) – a watchdog granted wide-ranging powers by the army and currently headed by a retired three-star general – reflects poorly on that promise. 

“The National Accountability Bureau is vested with several draconian powers that it really shouldn’t be vested with,” says Abdul Moiz Jaferii, a Karachi-based lawyer. “It should have been declared unconstitutional a long time ago, but hasn’t because it has always been the favorite tool of the military establishment to engineer politics with.”

Akhtar Soomro/Reuters
Security officers escort former Prime Minister Imran Khan in the Islamabad High Court, Islamabad, Pakistan, May 12, 2023. Mr. Khan was granted bail on Friday, days after his sudden arrest unleashed a firestorm of anger, largely directed toward the military.

Anti-corruption watchdog or army’s clean-up crew?

The charges against Mr. Khan relate to a corruption case in which the NAB has accused him of reaching a quid pro quo arrangement with billionaire real estate developer Malik Riaz, ultimately depriving the exchequer of more than $230 million. In return for the prime minister’s help, the NAB alleges, Mr. Riaz gifted 57 acres of valuable land to a trust registered in the names of Mr. Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi. Mr. Khan and his political party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI), deny the allegations.

“It is a solid case to answer because there’s been a favor extended to Malik Riaz unduly, which allowed him to effectively pocket money” bound for the state treasury, says Mr. Jaferii.

Merits of the case notwithstanding, Mr. Khan’s arrest has brought heightened scrutiny of Pakistan’s most influential institutions.

Pakistan has had six different prime ministers since 2008. Every one of them has been prosecuted by the NAB. Former Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, who preceded Mr. Khan, argues that the organization’s influence has rendered the country ungovernable. 

“Under the rules of business, the principal accounting officer of a ministry is not the minister but the secretary [the most senior civil servant in a government department]. To get to a politician, they have to accuse the secretary of corruption,” he explains. “So what they [NAB officers] do is they give the secretary two choices: You can either become an accused and go to jail, or you can become a witness against the minister.”

According to Mr. Abbasi, this fear of persecution has impacted the day-to-day governance of Pakistan. “Whatever work [bureaucrats] do, they take the path of least resistance, and you don’t get optimal decisions,” he says. 

The events of the last few days have only added to the sense of polarization in Pakistani society. The Supreme Court’s decision Thursday to declare Mr. Khan’s arrest illegal was chastised by the government, with Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif accusing the superior judiciary of bias toward Mr. Khan. 

“The judiciary has become like an iron shield for Imran Khan,” he is reported to have said in a cabinet meeting Thursday.

It is the integrity of the armed forces, however, that has been questioned most bitterly. 

Fayaz Aziz/Reuters
A Khan supporter participates in a protest against the former prime minister's arrest, in Peshawar, Pakistan, May 9, 2023. The charges against Mr. Khan relate to a corruption case in which officials have accused him of depriving Pakistan's treasury of more than $230 million.

Military under fire

For decades the sacred cow in Pakistani politics, the army has suffered a heavy blow to its prestige just eight months after its outgoing chief gave a commitment that it would henceforth remain within its constitutional limits. 

A day before his arrest, Mr. Khan accused two-star general and Inter-Services Intelligence officer Faisal Naseer, by name, of plotting to have him killed, a statement that experts say crossed an unspoken red line. These allegations, along with the seemingly retributive timing of Mr. Khan’s arrest, incited some of Mr. Khan’s supporters to target military installations. Altogether, these amounted to an unprecedented week of attacks against Pakistan’s “establishment.”

“There is a rage among people about what has been happening over the last year, not only politically, but also economically,” says former PTI minister Shireen Mazari. “And everybody knows that the real power behind decision-making since the ouster of the PTI government has been the military, so the anger was directed at the military and not at the ... government.”

At around 2 a.m. on Friday, some six hours after speaking to the Monitor, Dr. Mazari was arrested by police at her residence in Islamabad. Her daughter, a human rights lawyer, told the Monitor that Pakistan was effectively under military rule. 

“There is no civilian government in Pakistan right now,” says Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir. “Orders are coming directly from senior army and intelligence officials. There is complete abuse of law and impunity for the same.”

With the senior leadership of PTI in jail, there are fears that skirmishes between protesters and the state could continue over the weekend – but even if they do not, the crisis has left virtually every institution in the country tarnished.

“We were already facing a crippling economic crisis, an unprecedented political crisis, a constitutional crisis, burgeoning terrorism, a crisis of trust,” says a PTI senator, Sania Nishtar. “In this environment, the politically motivated illegal arrest of Pakistan’s most popular leader will have far-reaching consequences.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Pakistan’s army vowed to avoid politics. Now it’s back in the middle.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2023/0512/Pakistan-s-army-vowed-to-avoid-politics.-Now-it-s-back-in-the-middle
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe