Hope for women as Indian journalist is acquitted in #MeToo case

A New Delhi court has acquitted journalist Priya Ramani of criminal defamation after she accused M.J. Akbar, a prominent former editor-turned-politician of sexual harassment in 2018. Mr. Akbar had filed a case against Ms. Ramani, denying the allegations.

|
AP
Indian journalist Priya Ramani (left) smiles as she leaves Patiala House Court in New Delhi, India, Feb. 25, 2019. Her allegations of sexual harassment against a prominent Indian editor-turned-politician were a pivotal moment in the #MeToo movement in India in 2018.

A New Delhi court on Wednesday acquitted a journalist of criminal defamation after she accused a former editor-turned-politician and junior external affairs minister of sexual harassment.

M.J. Akbar filed a case against journalist Priya Ramani in October 2018, denying the allegations as “false, baseless, and wild.”

Ms. Ramani was the first to accuse Mr. Akbar of harassment, spurring more than 20 women to come forward and allege similar accusations during his previous career as one of the country’s most prominent news editors. A few days later, Mr. Akbar resigned from his post as a junior external affairs minister in 2018, becoming one of the most powerful men to step down in India’s #MeToo movement at the time.

On Wednesday, the court said “even a man of social status can be a sexual harasser,” and that the “right of reputation can’t be protected at the cost of right to dignity,” according to the legal news website Bar and Bench.

The string of allegations against Mr. Akbar began with a tweet from Ms. Ramani in October 2018 in which she said he was the man who had harassed her in an article she wrote for Vogue India the previous year. She had not named him in that article.

More than a dozen women, mostly journalists who worked with Mr. Akbar or interviewed with him for jobs when he was an editor, then accused him of sexual harassment.

Ms. Ramani welcomed Wednesday’s judgment. “My victory will empower more women to speak up. This will make powerful men think twice before they drag other people to courts,” she told reporters.

“She spoke up, she has not been afraid of standing in court and answering all the questions – she hasn’t swayed once,” Namita Bhandare, a journalist and close friend to Ms. Ramani, told The Associated Press.

Mr. Akbar, who has consistently denied all allegations, first served as a lawmaker for India’s then-ruling Congress party between 1989 and 1991. After that, he edited the Telegraph, The Asian Age, and other newspapers and wrote several nonfiction books, becoming one of the most influential people in Indian news media. In 2014, he joined the now-ruling Bharatiya Janata Party and was appointed its national spokesman. In 2016, he joined the Ministry of External Affairs as its junior minister.

“This victory is important because a powerful person with all the legal resources at his disposal took the most draconian route – he filed a criminal case against her, not civil,” Supreme Court lawyer Karuna Nundy said.

“So this win has a strong salutatory effect. It opens up a greater space for telling the truth and not to fear legal bullying,” she added.

Ms. Ramani’s allegations were a pivotal moment in the #MeToo movement in India, which picked up pace in 2018 as a spate of actresses and writers flooded social media with allegations of sexual harassment and assault.

Frustrated over an anti-harassment law that activists say has done little to change the status quo, women took to social media to lament a system that has failed to hear them. The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act of 2013 holds workplaces liable for sexual harassment and prescribes a system for investigating and redressing complaints.

The movement has helped bring awareness to the legislation, according to Ms. Nundy.

“Many more companies in the organized sector have put in anti-harassment committees and more are aware of this law now,” she said. But she cautioned that more work needs to be done to tackle harassment in formal and informal workplaces.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Hope for women as Indian journalist is acquitted in #MeToo case
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2021/0218/Hope-for-women-as-Indian-journalist-is-acquitted-in-MeToo-case
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe