12 convicted for 2006 Mumbai train bombings

The suspected Islamic militants face possible death penalties or life in prison for the terrorist attack in India that killed 188 people and injured over 800. 

Shailesh Andrade/Reuters
An accused man (face covered), surrounded by Indian policemen, is taken to a court in Mumbai, India, September 11, 2015. An Indian court on Friday convicted 12 of 13 men accused of planning blasts that ripped through Mumbai commuter trains in 2006, killing more than 180 people and wounding hundreds. REUTERS/Shailesh Andrade

Nearly a decade after the bombing of seven Mumbai commuter trains that killed 188 people and injured over 800, twelve suspected Islamic militants were convicted Friday. They face possible death penalties or life in prison.

The trial lasted more than seven years and concluded in August 2014, but Judge Yatin D. Shinde took one year to write the verdict. India's justice system is notoriously slow.

Schinde found 12 defendants guilty of murder and criminal conspiracy and acquitted one person for lack of evidence. He said he would announce the sentences on Monday after hearing arguments from the prosecutors and defense attorneys.

Seven bombs exploded within a span of 10 minutes during the evening rush hour on trains in Mumbai, the financial and entertainment capital of India, on July 11, 2006.

Prosecutors said the conspiracy was hatched by Pakistan's Directorate of Inter-Services Intelligence, or ISI, and carried out by Lashkar-e-Taiba operatives with help from the Students' Islamic Movement of India, a banned militant organization.

The 12 convicted in the case were believed to belong to the Indian militant group.

Lashkar-e-Taiba is a Pakistan-based Islamic militant group. Pakistan has denied the Indian claims.

The neighboring countries have fought three wars since their independence from Britain in 1947 and have been engaged in a fitful peace process in recent years.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.