Aung San Suu Kyi meets with Myanmar political, military leaders

The opposition leader sat down with government leaders and members of the military to discuss reforms prior to an election later this year.

Khin Maung Win/AP
Myanmar opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, right, talks with Aye Maung, second right, chairman of Rakhine National Party and a representative of ethnic minorities, Myanmar Upper House Speaker Khin Aung Myint, second left, and Myanmar’s Commander-in-chief Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, left, as they arrive to attend a meeting at Presidential Palace Friday, April 10, 2015, in Naypyitaw, Myanmar.

Opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi held talks with Myanmar's top political and military leaders Friday in what a government spokesman described as a "successful meeting," but there was no sign the participants bridged their differences on political reforms ahead of an election later this year.

Reaching at least a general agreement is probably a prerequisite for Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy to take part in the polls. It feels that several clauses in the constitution are unfair, including one that does not allow Suu Kyi to become president because her sons are foreign citizens. Ethnic minority parties also want some changes in the constitution, which was enacted under military rule in 2008.

The unprecedented talks at the presidential house in Naypyitaw brought together President Thein Sein, Suu Kyi, top military commander Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, the speaker and the president of both houses of parliament and a representative of ethnic minorities, Aye Maung.

"What is important is that these talks continue and this should lead to the kind of agreements that will smooth the way to free, fair, inclusive elections," Suu Kyi told reporters Thursday ahead of the talks. She declined to say if her party would boycott the elections if she finds conditions unacceptable, as she has suggested in the past.

A boycott could give the international community the perception of an unfair election, and lead to a slowdown in aid that is needed to boost Myanmar's economy. Moves toward democracy under Thein Sein led many Western countries to ease sanctions they had in place against the previous military regime.

Her National League for Democracy party is considered to have a strong chance of defeating Thein Sein's military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party. Suu Kyi's party boycotted the 2010 polls because it believed the legal conditions were unacceptable. It participated in 2012 by-elections after some rules were amended, and won 43 of the 44 seats it contested.

In his introductory remarks at the meeting before the doors were closed to the press, Thein Sein said "personal and political party interests should be set aside and work be done in the interest of the country," also paying heed to the importance of holding a free and fair election.

President spokesman and Information Minister Ye Htut told reporters that the meeting "discussed issues on constitution amendments, the ethnic peace process, the holding of a free and fair election and stability during the post-election period."

He said the two-hour gathering "was held in a frank and open manner and all agreed that it was a successful meeting," and that the participants agreed to meet again when parliament reopens. It is in holiday recess now and will resume its work on May 11.

A well-known political analyst, Yan Myo Thein, said he was disappointed with the talks because they appeared to lack substance.

"The results of the talks are not very encouraging," he said, complaining that the talks lack transparency. "We hoped to hear more positive news."

However, lawmaker Thein Nyunt, chairman of New National League for Democracy, said he hoped such meetings "could help build better understanding and could ease the tension among the respective parties. I hope all the participants will talk in the spirit of national reconciliation."

Myanmar was under military rule from 1962 until 2010, when the generals allowed polls leading to an elected government, but under rules critics said were unfair and allowed the defense forces to continue to hold power behind the scenes. But when he became president in 2011, Thein Sein started a process of political and economic liberalization after the decades of repressive rule.

Suu Kyi said Thursday the upcoming elections were more important than the 2010 polls "because the second election will decide whether the reform process really is a genuine one and whether it is going in a way in which we all hope it should go."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to