Indian women turn spotlight on sexual harassment at work

Two women in India have gone public with allegations of sexual harassment, nearly one year after a brutal gang rape case in Delhi sparked national outrage.

Anindito Mukherjee/Reuters
Tarun Tejpal, the editor-in-chief of India's leading investigative magazine Tehelka, speaks with the media at the airport in New Delhi on November 29, 2013. Tejpal is accused of sexually assaulting a reporter. An investigation into Tejpal, who denies the accusations, is underway in Goa. He has not been formally charged with any crime.

Two high-profile allegations of sexual assault in India have shone a spotlight on harassment of woman at the workplace, nearly one year after the rape and murder of a female student on a Delhi bus fueled a national conversation on sexual violence. Four men were later convicted of that crime. 

By breaking their silence, the professional women who publicly accused their male bosses may have broken a taboo and changed the debate from rape on the streets to sexual violence at the office. The two accused men, a magazine editor and a retired senior judge, have denied the claims; one, the editor, is under arrest but hasn't been formally charged. 

"Sexual harassment at workplaces is rampant and seen as normal. Women….were blamed for speaking up. But now something is changing," says political scientist Nivedita Menon, author of ‘Seeing Like A Feminist,’ a book on India’s feminist movement.

A prominent magazine editor and novelist, Tarun Tejpal, was arrested on Saturday by police in the small, wealthy state of Goa on charges of sexually assaulting and raping a woman reporter in the elevator at a five star hotel in early November. Mr. Tejpal and his colleagues at Tehelka, a news magazine, were in Goa for a global conference whose speakers included Robert De Niro and VS Naipaul.

"Well, this is the easiest way for you to keep your job," the journalist - who has remained unidentified - quoted her editor as saying while he was assaulting her. In her complaint to another editor, she demand an apology from Tejpal to all magazine staffers and pointed out that the magazine known for its tough investigative reporting didn’t have a sexual harassment complaints committee, which is required by law. After the scandal broke in the media, Goa police detained Tejpal, who could face up to ten years in prison if found guilty.

As this scandal was percolating in India’s media, another white-collar accuser stepped into the limelight. In a blog posting, a law intern claimed that she had been molested by a Supreme Court judge. After The Times of India splashed the story on its front page, the Chief Justice set up an internal committee to investigate. The alleged molester was identified as a retired court judge. He has received public support from some senior and retired judges, and police have yet to take over the case, raising questions over the court's handling of the complaint. 

"These two cases have definitely been a turning point in sexual harassment at the workplace, " says Kavita Krishnan, general secretary of the All India Progressive Women's Association. Last year’s bus rape led to stricter laws on sexual harassment and violence, but Indian companies have been slow to step up action on workplace abuses, she adds.

"The elites are happy to demand capital punishment when the rapist is a poor laborer but now the spotlight is in them," she says. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Indian women turn spotlight on sexual harassment at work
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today