In India, Cyclone Phailin's devastation tempered by planning

Cyclone Phailin has cost many lives and left a trail of destruction in India. But a rare coordinated emergency response before the storm hit saved many more lives.

Bikas Das/AP
A man on a motorcycle picks his way through debris in Berhampur, India, after Cyclone Phailin passed through the town. The cyclone weakened Sunday after making landfall.

India heaved a sigh of relief as Cyclone Phailin hit its east coast but left very few casualties, thanks to a speedy mass evacuation of nearly a million people. The official death toll of 14 so far includes 7 who died after being hit by falling trees before the cyclone hit. As rescue officials reach remote areas, the death toll is expected to climb but not top 100. 

While any loss of life is tragic, the coordination of early warning with a proactive mass evacuation is a rarity in India. Though the cyclone was not as powerful as some meteorologists had feared, a much greater loss of life was avoided by what is being described as the largest pre-disaster evacuation in India's history.  The Odisha cyclone of 1999 in the same area left roughly 10,000 people dead. 

This time the state of Odisha evacuated 900,000 people and the state of Andhra Pradesh evacuated 100,000 from flood prone coastal areas over 24 hours. The evacuation was in contrast to heavy rain and landslides in the northern hill-state of Uttarakhand in June, which killed 6,000 people as weather warnings were not heeded and evacuation plans were not in place.

Cyclone Phailin has been categorized as "very severe," equivalent to a Category 4 hurricane in the US. The Indian Meteorological Department said that American forecasters' warnings of a Hurricane Katrina-like Category 5 "super-cyclone" were proven wrong. There is no difference between a "hurricane" and a "cyclone" except their geographical origin. "Cyclone" is the preferred term for this type of storm across much of the Indian Ocean; "hurricane" is preferred for storms originating in the Atlantic and northern Pacific.

Air and train service began being resumed in the affected areas on Sunday morning. Mobile phone networks and power are likewise being restored.

"Clearly a lot has been learnt from the 1999 experience," says Sushil Kumar, a federal government official who has dealt with disaster management for years, including a stint with the United Nations Development Programme. Following the 1999 cyclone "the state and federal governments, along with UNDP, World Bank and other civil society organizations, put in place measures to minimize damage from the next cyclone. That is showing," says Mr Kumar.

The measures include early warning from the meteorological department and making sure the warnings reach the remotest villages in time for them to flee. Thousands of cyclone shelters came to the rescue of people to spend the night between Saturday and Sunday, which some have described as being like experiencing non-stop earthquake tremors for hours.

While lives have been saved, Phailin has left massive economic damage in its wake. Cyclonic winds, heavy rains and flooding have destroyed over 500,000 hectares of crops worth an estimated 24 billion Indian Rupees ($395 million), according to Odisha’s disaster management minister, S.N. Patro. Picking up the pieces will be hardest for the poor whose mud-and-thatch houses have been swept away.

"Credit must be given to the government for this first of its kind prevention of large scale death in a natural calamity," says Sunita Narain, director of the Centre for Science and Environment in Delhi. "However, we now need to move to the next scale to see how we can minimize economic damage from the next cyclone. We will see extreme weather events more often thanks to climate change, and should be better prepared."

SC Sahu, director of the Odisha Meteorological Department, says that technology played an important role this time. "Back in 1991 we did not have the ability to make models that would accurately predict weather for seven days. Today we do, and we had enough time to save lives," he says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.