31 killed in Indian religious violence

Hindus and Muslims in India rioted over the weekend, killing at least 31, and sparking fear of a return to communal violence.

Rajesh Kumar Singh/AP
Officials and security forces patrol during an army-enforced curfew imposed following deadly clashes between Hindus and Muslims at Muzaffarnagar in Uttar Pradesh state, India, Monday, Sept. 9, 2013. Gunfire and street battles that erupted Saturday have killed at least 31 people and left many more wounded or missing, police said.

Hindu-Muslim violence 80 miles from Delhi in Muzaffarnagar in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh, has left 31 dead and 40 more in the hospital raising fears of a return to widespread communal violence. 

The riot is one of the biggest cases of Hindu-Muslim violence in India this year. India's home minister said today that the country had seen 451 incidents of violence between religious groups so far this year, as compared with 410 incidents in all of 2012.

The increasing violence is reminiscent of the bloody riots in Gujarat state in 2002 that left more than 1,000 people dead, according to official estimates. Such large-scale Hindu-Muslim violence seemed to have ebbed since then – until this year.

“Many thought that with increasing prosperity violence between communities declines,” says historian and columnist Ramachandra Guha. “But India is a large and complex country and Pluralism is always a hard-won daily battle. While civil society has been active in its work for communal harmony, the consensus amongst the political class that we need communal harmony at all costs, seems to no longer be there.”

The death toll is expected to rise. The military and police have been deployed in the area and issued a curfew. And dozens of families were seen leaving the area on Sunday night, according to reports. 

The recent violence began on Aug. 27, when three young men were killed after an altercation between Hindus and Muslims about a man of one community sexually harassing the woman of another. Indian media conventions do not identify the communities in news reports so as not to fan further violence.

While the ruling Samajwadi Party in Uttar Pradesh has been accused of not acting quick enough to the violence by arresting the accused immediately, the Hindu nationalist Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) has been accused of fanning the violence. “The Samajwadi Party has completely failed to maintain law and order in the state,” says political analyst Ajoy Bose. 

The Uttar Pradesh state has seen 50 incidents of communal violence since the Samajwadi Party came to power in March last year, according to the Times of India. Communal clashes have also taken place in various parts of Bihar state and a riot in Kishtwar town of Jammu and Kashmir after Eid prayers left three dead last month. 

“No riot is apolitical,” says Lucknow-based human rights activist Shahnawaz Khan of the Rihai Manch, a nongovernmental organization in Uttar Pradesh for the release of prisoners falsely charged with terrorism cases.

“These riots are taking place so as to cause Hindu-Muslim polarization of voters in anticipation of the general elections in April 2014. We'll see a lot more of this in the next nine months. What's new is that violence is now spreading to rural areas, though earlier it used to be restricted to cities,” he says. 

The election campaign has begun early with the opposition BJP projecting the controversial Narendra Modi as its prime ministerial candidate. Mr. Modi, the chief minister of Gujarat state, is accused by many of having looked the other way as Hindu mobs killed 1,200 Muslims in 2002.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 31 killed in Indian religious violence
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today