Taliban attack Kabul resort, citing 'illicit fun' and alcohol

Taliban militants killed at least 20 people in an all-night battle with Afghan security forces at a popular resort near Kabul.

Musadeq Sadeq/AP
Afghan policemen stand guard outside of the Spozhmai Hotel on Lake Qurgha where security officials say Taliban insurgents killed nearly two dozen people, most of them civilians, in an attack just north of Kabul, Afghanistan, Friday.

Taliban militants attacked a popular resort near Kabul late Thursday night and battled with Afghan security forces well into Friday morning, underscoring the group's continued ability to mount serious challenges to security even in the capital.

Up to seven insurgents stormed a restaurant and hotel at 11:30 Thursday night and took the guests hostage, including children. Afghan police officials say that between 250 and 300 hostages were freed within the first hours of the clashes, but another 40 weren’t freed until morning. Several guests jumped into the lake to escape the attack, but, unable to swim, clung to a stone wall until police could rescue them in the morning. At least 20 people died in the fighting.

Coming as international forces work to stabilize the country as much as possible before handing full security responsibility to Afghans in the end of 2014, high-profile attacks like Friday’s are a serious concern for many Afghans. Carried out by small insurgent bands, the attacks usually have relatively low death tolls, but go a long way toward eroding Afghan perceptions of security.

“It is really important to counter such insurgent attacks in the capital because every high-profile attack, even if it only happens every one month or every three months, it shows that Afghanistan is unstable and the insurgents are close to the capital,” says Waliullah Rahmani, executive director of the Kabul Center for Strategic Studies. “Just waging attacks on every single target means a success for the insurgents.”

The Taliban claimed responsibility for Friday’s attack, saying that Afghan government officials and foreigners frequent the restaurant and hotel and drink alcohol there.

“The mujahideen entered a small hotel and attacked a neighboring hotel that was used by foreigners for their illicit fun and having parties. It was a special hotel for Afghan government officials and foreigners,” says Zabiullah Mujahid, a spokesman for the Taliban.

Mr. Mujahid claimed that only foreigners and Afghan government workers were killed in the attack and that the fighters took special effort to protect children caught in the fighting.

Such Taliban statements are common, and the group often reports killing Afghan and international soldiers when they have actually killed civilians.

The attack took place at Qargha Lake, about a 30-minute drive outside of downtown Kabul. The area is one of the most popular weekend getaway spots for residents of the capital and other parts of Afghanistan. The lake is ringed by a number of restaurants and hotels, and Afghanistan’s only golf course is also located in Qargha.

Although foreigners in Afghanistan often visit Qargha Lake, it is predominantly a destination for Afghans. Officials say the Taliban managed to enter the area by coming from the west, allowing them to avoid checkpoints that are pervasive deeper inside the capital.

“It’s a sign that Kabul is still insecure – whenever the insurgents want to go anywhere and attack, they can,” says Anwar Khan Oryakhail, a member of parliament from Kabul. “It’s the responsibility of the security organizations to be more alert and more active. Whenever there is an attack, afterwards the security organizations say they had intelligence reports. They should be ready and stop the attacks before the insurgents arrive at their targets.”

Afghan security forces have responsibility for security in Kabul, but they can call on NATO forces for assistance if needed. NATO helicopters provided support during Friday’s battle, but the operation was Afghan-led.

Prior to Friday, Kabul suffered its most recent attack on April 15 when insurgents managed to conduct 18 hours of attacks from several locations throughout the city, as well as three provinces in eastern Afghanistan. Though the number of insurgents killed in the attack was more than double the number of civilians or security forces killed, it succeeded in creating deep concerns about the stability and security of Afghanistan. 

*Zubair Babakarkhail contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Taliban attack Kabul resort, citing 'illicit fun' and alcohol
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today