Mark Schiefelbein/AP
A man walks past the offices of Chinese e-commerce firm Alibaba in Beijing, Aug. 10, 2021. Under a law approved Friday by its ceremonial legislature, China is tightening control over data about the public gathered by companies.

China passes data privacy law, tightens control over companies

On Friday, China approved a strict data privacy law, but concerns about the Communist Party government accessing data remain. Meanwhile, the U.S. has not yet enacted a federal data privacy law. 

China is tightening control over information gathered by companies about the public under a law approved Friday by its ceremonial legislature, expanding the ruling Communist Party’s crackdown on internet industries.

The law would impose some of the world’s strictest controls on private-sector handling of information about individuals but appears not to affect the ruling party’s pervasive surveillance or access to those corporate data.

Its passage follows anti-monopoly and other enforcement actions against companies including e-commerce giant Alibaba and games and social media operator Tencent that caused their share prices to plunge.

The law, which takes effect Nov. 1, follows complaints that companies misused or sold customers’ data without their knowledge or permission, leading to fraud or unfair practices such as charging higher prices to some users.

The law curbs what information companies can gather and sets standards for how it must be stored. The full text wasn’t immediately released, but earlier drafts would require customer permission to sell data to another company.

Alibaba shares lost 2.6% in Hong Kong after news of the law’s passage. Tencent sank after the announcement but ended up 1%. Pinduoduo, an online grocer, was down 1.2% in pre-market trading on the U.S.-based Nasdaq.

The law is similar to Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, which limits collection and handling of customer data. But unlike laws in Western countries, earlier drafts of the Chinese legislation say nothing about limiting ruling party or government access to personal information.

The ruling party has been accused of using data gathered about Uyghurs and other members of predominantly Muslim ethnic groups in the northwestern region of Xinjiang to carry out a widespread campaign of repression.

Chinese authorities are “concerned at the volume of data big tech has in respect of the population and the power they can provide,” said Paul Haswell of law firm Pinsent Masons. He called the measure China’s version of the GDPR.

Most organizations, however, should be prepared after Chinese authorities imposed other restrictions on data oversight, Haswell said.

In April, Alibaba was fined a record $2.8 billion for anti-competitive practices.

This month, the government said online education companies are no longer allowed to receive foreign investment or operate as for-profit businesses.

The United States Congress has been discussing creating a federal data privacy law for the country for several years. In both the Senate and House of Representatives, members have developed privacy legislation.

In the Senate, Washington Democrat Sen. Maria Cantwell, chair of the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, has proposed privacy legislation called the Consumer Online Privacy Rights Act (COPRA). The top Republican on the committee, Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi also has introduced a privacy bill, the Setting an American Framework to Ensure Data Access, Transparency, and Accountability Act (SAFE DATA Act). Senator Wicker signed onto a bicameral letter by Republicans last month urging the president to take action on the issue. 

In the absence of a new federal standard, states have taken action. Last year, the California Consumer Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) took effect. Virginia and Colorado have also enacted laws. 

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to China passes data privacy law, tightens control over companies
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2021/0820/China-passes-data-privacy-law-tightens-control-over-companies
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe