Gender equality in Cambodia takes a small step forward

In Cambodia, a shift in attitude appears to be taking place as a national campaign tries to combat violence against women. But advocates for gender equality remain skeptical and want to see deeper commitment from the government.

|
Samrang Pring/Reuters
A man rides a motorcycle past the National Assembly in Phnom Penh, Aug. 24, 2014. Cambodia ranked 89th on the World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap Index in 2020, compared to 112th in 2016.

Dinner is late. The laundry isn’t done. The pickles aren’t sour enough. When it comes to reasons for a man to beat his wife, Rem Ran has heard it all.

For most of his 40 years, the construction worker saw domestic violence as “a normal part of life” in a nation where, until 2007, girls were taught in school not to challenge husbands via a traditional code of conduct still found in some textbooks.

Now he steps in when domestic disputes erupt in his rural community and is part of a nationwide drive to instill men as advocates for women’s rights, as Cambodia this month also launched a national plan to combat violence against women.

“I’ve seen so much rape and senseless violence against women,” Mr. Ran told the Thomson Reuters Foundation during a workshop in Phnom Penh, where about a dozen men from the countryside were learning about gender equality.

“Usually, authorities overlook it – they say it’s a private matter that should be left to the couple at all costs – but we make it a collective issue and we advocate to authorities that it must stop.”

Mr. Ran is among 30 men coached by Gender and Development for Cambodia, a nonprofit, to identify and root out violence against women by intervening in disputes, holding workshops, and acting as a go-to for victims and authorities in communities.

Gender-based violence “comes from a mindset, an idea that is so deeply ingrained that it is almost impossible to retrain,” said Mr. Ran.

Campaigners have noted improvements in gender equality in Cambodia, which ranked 89th on the World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap Index in 2020 compared to 112th in 2016.

But a series of events in the Southeast Asian nation in 2020 drew condemnation from advocates around the world.

In February, an online vendor was jailed on pornography charges, two days after Prime Minister Hun Sen said that women were encouraging sexual assault by wearing provocative outfits while selling clothes via livestream.

Five months later, a new draft law criminalizing outfits deemed to be immodest was leaked to the media. The draft law is still awaiting approval by various ministries.

Victim shaming

In September, a police chief was spared prosecution despite an investigation finding he had sexually abused four junior female officers and silenced them with threats to block their careers.

The victims were praised for their bravery in coming forward in a groundbreaking case and campaigners called unsuccessfully for the Women’s Affairs Ministry to take a stand after the government backed off prosecution to “protect the dignity” of the women.

“Dignity starts with justice,” said Mu Sochua, who led the ministry from 1998 to 2004 and ushered in groundbreaking laws and policies on domestic violence and human trafficking.

“Where was the minister? ... This was a great opportunity for the minister to take a stand and say ‘No, take this case to court’.”

The ministry did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

As campaigners decried a backslide in women’s rights, authorities reasoned in each case that they were out to protect Cambodian culture and the dignity of women.

“Policing women’s bodies is not about culture or dignity,” said Ros Sopheap, director of Gender and Development for Cambodia (GADC). “Look at who makes all these decisions: men. It’s about protecting the status quo and the patriarchy.”

In a 2019 review of Cambodia, the United Nations called for an end to “social norms that justify gender-based violence,” including the abolition of the Chbap Srey, a poem that is a “root cause of the disadvantaged position of women.”

The Chbap Srey, or women’s code, has been passed down through the generations since the 14th century and, until 2007, was part of the school curriculum with girls expected to memorize all 16 verses.

“In terms of rhythm, it is in excellent form, very elegantly written,” said So Phina, an author, poet, and program manager at Cambodian Living Arts, a charity that preserves traditional art forms.

“But the meaning is extremely harmful. ... It has a huge effect on society – invisible, unconscious effects, many that you can’t see.”

The poem teaches women to serve, obey, and fear their husbands, while never airing grievances outside the home, campaigners say.

It dictates how women should dress and behave in public, and states that breaches could “ruin the prestige of the family.”

“You should serve well; don’t make him disappointed. Forgive him in the name of woman; don’t speak in a way that you consider him as equal,” the Chbap Srey goes.

“Keep silent in order to have peace,” reads another line.

“When we were young, we just learned it and we were very grateful that people would teach us how to behave, how to be a good woman,” Ms. Phina said.

“Only when we grow, with reading, with other education, do we learn that we need to question why this code is imposed on women ... but it’s hard to reverse that.”

The code was banned from schools in 2007 but extracts can still be found in current grade 7, 8, and 9 textbooks for girls in their early teens.

Sun Bunna, director of curriculum development at the education ministry, said he was unaware of the ban and the Chbap Srey was a way to teach girls to be brave and stand on equal footing in society.

“It’s good; it’s not bad at all,” he said.

He added that criticism can be attributed to poor interpretations of the code, while deflecting questions about whether it contributed to violence against women.

“Now we have a very open global society, [women] can read news from every corner of the world and sometimes she adapts that information and sometimes she can create violence,” he said.

While Cambodia this month launched a nationwide plan to combat violence against women, campaigners remained skeptical about its ability to root out “social norms entrenched in every layer of society.”

“Victim-blaming rhetoric, which the Cambodian government has continued to espouse ... only further entrenches gender inequality and sustains an enabling environment for violence and impunity,” said Naly Pilorge, director of local human rights group LICADHO.

“Without a genuine commitment to gender equality from all levels of government, the [plan] will have little impact on the lives of women in Cambodia.”

Meanwhile, Seup Sokha, a rice farmer who used to abuse his wife in what he called a “dictatorial relationship,” has become the person that neighbors and authorities rely on to mediate domestic disputes in his community.

“There’s no education around this, for authorities or normal people, just a mindset and tradition that oppresses women into thinking they must stay silent no matter what,” he said.

“I have a daughter. I had to change my mindset and spread what I have learned because I don’t think she’d be safe in the current environment.”

This story was reported by The Thomson Reuters Foundation.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Gender equality in Cambodia takes a small step forward
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2021/0129/Gender-equality-in-Cambodia-takes-a-small-step-forward
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe