In controversial move, China passes Hong Kong security law draft

China's legislature passed a draft on Thursday of the national security law that spurred massive protests in Hong Kong last year. This latest step has been openly criticized by the G-7.

Kin Cheung/AP
Demonstrators protest the national security bill at a shopping mall in Hong Kong on June 16, 2020. Beijing passed a draft of the law two days later that outlines four crimes against national security, but doesn't offer details about punishments for those crimes.

China's legislature on Thursday passed a draft of a national security bill for Hong Kong that has been strongly criticized as undermining the semi-autonomous region's legal and political institutions.

The National People's Congress' Standing Committee reviewed the bill that covers four categories of crimes: succession, subversion of state power, local terrorist activities, and collaborating with foreign or external foreign forces to endanger national security.

No details on the definitions of those crimes or the applicable punishments were given. It also wasn't clear when the law would be passed in its final version, although Beijing has repeatedly said it is determined to press ahead despite the criticism.

The congress moved to enact the legislation at the national level after Hong Kong's own Legislative Council was unable to do so because of strong local opposition. Critics say it could severely limit free speech and opposition political activity.

Legal experts say Beijing's justifications for the law are highly debatable.

China acted following widespread and sometimes violent anti-government protests in the territory last year that Beijing saw as a dangerous campaign to split Hong Kong from the rest of the country.

The United States has said that the law if passed will revoke some of the special privileges it grants to Hong Kong after the former British colony was handed over to China in 1997. Britain has said it will offer passports and a path to citizenship to as many as 3 million Hong Kong residents. Beijing has denounced the moves as interference in its affairs.

On Wednesday, the Group of Seven leading economies called on China to reconsider its plans in a joint statement voicing "grave concern regarding China's decision to impose a national security law on Hong Kong," adding that it would breach Beijing's international commitments as well as the territory's constitution.

"It would jeopardize the system which has allowed Hong Kong to flourish and made it a success over many years," they said. "Open debate, consultation with stakeholders, and respect for protected rights and freedoms in Hong Kong are essential."

China's foreign ministry condemned the G-7 statement, accusing the group of "speaking and pointing fingers freely at Hong Kong affairs."

"We strongly deplore and firmly oppose the joint statement issued by the G-7 foreign ministers," the ministry spokesperson said at a daily briefing. "China's determination in promoting the national security law in Hong Kong is unwavering."

In Berlin on Thursday, German Chancellor Angela Merkel called for an "open dialogue" between Europe and China on an investment agreement, climate change, and Africa – "but also on questions of the rule of law and human rights, and not least the future of Hong Kong, where we are concerned that the important principle of 'one country, two systems' is being hollowed out more and more."

The Asian financial hub's highly respected legal system already covers security issues from money laundering to terrorism and cybercrime. That leaves the proposed legislation to deal with vaguely defined crimes of a highly political nature along the lines found in mainland China's Communist Party-dominated system.

Earlier this month, Hong Kong's legislature approved a contentious bill making it illegal to insult the Chinese national anthem after pro-democracy lawmakers boycotted the vote out of protest.

Senior opposition figures have also been arrested for taking part in demonstrations and questions have arisen over whether the national security legislation will be used to disqualify pro-democracy candidates in September's elections for the Beijing-controlled Legislative Council.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. AP writer Geir Moulson in Berlin contributed to this report.

Editor’s note: As a public service, the Monitor has removed the paywall for all our coronavirus coverage. It’s free.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.