Plans for train connecting Korean peninsula to region remain stalled

Rail travel linking the Korean peninsula, Russia, and beyond would connect markets and make travel more efficient. But sanctions and distrust stand in the way.

Minh Hoang/AP/File
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un waves from his train as he arrives at the railway station in Dong Dang, Vietnam, for a meeting in March with President Donald Trump.

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's decision to take a train to his summit with President Vladimir Putin in Russia's far east hints at the potential of a much bigger dream long held by many in Asia: unimpeded travel by rail from the southern tip of the Korean Peninsula to Moscow and beyond.

The economic benefits range from linking big, thriving markets and bolstering regional cooperation to slashing costs and travel durations. But with sanctions and distrust standing in the way, it could be a very long time before any trains working their way north from Seoul will be passing through Pyongyang Station.

After a day of talks Thursday, Mr. Kim boarded his trademark green-and-yellow carriage for the trip back across the two countries' shared border and on to Pyongyang, a journey Mr. Kim can apparently make in under a day. That's less than a third the time it takes for normal North Koreans to get to the border – longer if there are breakdowns and power outages, which aren't uncommon.

For North Korean leaders, cross-border train travel is the norm.

Mr. Kim's father and grandfather used trains extensively during their years in power. Kim Il Sung, the country's "eternal president" took his special train to China, the Soviet Union and on through eastern Europe in 1974. Kim Jong Il rode the rails to Moscow in 2001.

Kim Jong Un has also taken trains for his summits in Beijing and Hanoi.

But aside from a well-worn link with Beijing, the use of North Korean railways for trade or tourism has never been particularly smooth — a situation South Korea, in particular, has long wanted to rectify.

Big-ticket rail projects were a key part of the South's "Sunshine Policy" of engagement with the North from the late 1990s until 2009, when the North conducted a nuclear test that sent relations into a rapid downward spiral. Just four years later, former President Park Geun-hye made a "Eurasia Initiative" one of her key goals, with a plan for what she called the "Silk Road Express," which would connect South and North and continue on to Europe through Russia and China.

She didn't get very far with the project – she was impeached and sentenced last year to serve 24 years in prison for bribery, coercion and abuse of power.

Moon Jae-in, the current president, has once again taken up the mantle.

In his first summit with Mr. Kim, in April last year, he laid out a $35-billion project for a high-speed train linking Seoul to Pyongyang and going farther north to Sinuiju, an important trade hub on the Chinese border.

Mr. Moon has made it clear he sees the establishment of road and rail links with the North as a potentially lucrative proposal because it would open the way for the cheap and relatively fast transportation of goods and people. Seoul argues the policy is also smart diplomacy – such links would encourage regional economic integration with China and Russia, giving both a stronger reason to cooperate in efforts to improve the political situation on the peninsula.

Russia appears to agree, though it is less enthusiastic about making big commitments.

It invested about $340 million to renovate a 33-mile stretch of railway that connects the North's Rajin special trade zone and port with the Russian town of Khasan. The work was completed in 2013 and 40,500 tons of Russian coal were sent via rail to Rajin port for transport on a Chinese-flagged ship to Pohang, in South Korea, in the summer 2014.

Moscow announced a $25 billion plan to modernize 2,200 miles of railways in the North, or half its total, that same year. Experts point out the plan was more of an estimate of likely needs than a commitment to actually cover that cost.

Along with the costs of revamping the North's dilapidated rail system, however, the political climate in Washington remains a big hurdle.

The Trump administration maintains that sanctions must stay in place until Mr. Kim commits to denuclearize his country.

During a period of greater detente, the Koreas started freight services between the South's Munsan Station and the North's Panmun Station in 2007. The South used the trains to move construction materials north, while clothing and shoes made at the factory park were sent south.

But the line was cut in November 2008 due to political tensions over North Korea's nuclear program.

For the first time since then, a South Korean train rolled into North Korea last November to begin a weeklong rail survey. South Korean officials traveled to North Korea by train the next month to attend a groundbreaking ceremony for a joint project to modernize the North's railways and roads and connect them with the South.

Beyond on-site reviews and ceremonies, however, the U.S.-led sanctions make it virtually impossible for the ambitious project to begin in earnest.

Merely traveling to the groundbreaking ceremony required a special exemption from the U.N. Security Council because it involved South Korean transport vehicles and goods.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.