Hong Kong commits to ban ivory trading by 2021

In a landmark decision, lawmakers in Hong Kong approved a proposal to ban local ivory trading by 2021, agreeing to include stiffer fines and penalties. WWF called for other Asian countries such as Vietnam and Laos to institute similar bans to deter ivory traders.

Kin Cheung/AP
Animal conservation activists hold placards and a picture of an elephant outside the Legislative Council in Hong Kong on Jan. 31, 2018. Lawmakers in Hong Kong have agreed to ban ivory trading by 2021, a decision applauded by wildlife conservation activists.

Hong Kong lawmakers gave final approval on Wednesday to a government proposal banning local ivory trading in the Chinese territory by 2021, with conservation groups hailing it as a major victory in the fight to save elephants.

Lawmakers overwhelmingly supported the measure, voting 49 to 4 to amend the existing law to outlaw sales of ivory in Hong Kong, which researchers say is the world's biggest retail ivory market.

The proposal also includes significantly stiffer penalties to deter smuggling of ivory and other highly endangered species.
Under the new law, the maximum sentence will increase to a 10 million Hong Kong dollar ($1.3 million) fine, double the current amount, and 10 years in prison, up from the current two years.

Wildlife activists applauded the move, even as Hong Kong moves more slowly than Beijing. Mainland China, the biggest source of global ivory demand, banned sales at the start of the year after shutting all carving factories and shops last March.

"A ban on ivory sales with heavier penalties in Hong Kong shows a clear commitment towards the future of African elephants," Cheryl Lo of the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) said in a statement. "This will help reverse the trend of elephant poaching and illegal ivory trafficking."

The existing Hong Kong law allowed domestic sales of ivory dating from before CITES, or the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Under CITES, ivory trading started to be regulated in the mid-1970s before a total ban in 1990 on international sales.

Activists say there are signs that unscrupulous dealers were exploiting that loophole to "launder" newer, illicit ivory, making Hong Kong a major black market trading hub.

They hailed the ban as a major step in efforts to slow the poaching that results in the annual slaughter of tens of thousands of elephants and threatens the lives of park rangers in Africa.

The Hong Kong government refused to offer any compensation to the city's dozens of ivory shop owners and hundreds of licensed traders, who had demanded tens of millions of dollars in return for giving up their ivory stockpile, estimated at 670 metric tons (740 tons).

The new law will take effect in stages, with the full ban coming into effect at the end of 2021 after traders' current licenses expire.
Conservation groups, worried that Hong Kong's five-year enforcement gap with mainland China would fuel an increase in illegal trading, urged authorities to enforce regulations and step up monitoring.

WWF also called for governments in other Asian countries such as Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Japan to institute similar bans, saying there was evidence that those markets are increasingly catering to Chinese visitors.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.