Could South Korea see second impeachment?

After special prosecutors were denied permission to extend their investigation and question the impeached president, opposition parties threatened to impeach the acting president, as well.

Ahn Young-joon/AP
Protesters stage a rally calling for impeachment of South Korean President Park Geun-hye as the Constitutional Court holds its final hearing in the impeachment trial of Park in front of the court in Seoul in Seoul, South Korea, on Monday, Feb. 27, 2017. A special investigation team is wrapping up its probe into a huge scandal involving Park after the country's acting leader refused to extend its investigation past a Tuesday deadline. The sign read: "Impeach Park Geun-hye immediately."

South Korea's corruption scandal took another twist Monday, as Prime Minister Hwang Kyo-ahn – acting as president since President Park Geun-hye's impeachment in December – refused special prosecutors permission to extend their investigation by 30 days.

The investigation team made the request to allow time for questioning of the impeached president, who has been temporarily stripped of her powers until the Constitutional Court decides whether or not to uphold her impeachment – a decision expected next month.

“After much deliberation,” said Hong Kwon-heui, a spokesman for Mr. Hwang, “the acting president has decided that it would be best for the country's stability to not extend the special investigation and for the prosecutors to take over.” These “prosecutors” are individual state prosecutors, as opposed to the “special prosecutors” whose investigation was slated to conclude, and likely now will, on Tuesday. 

Soon after Mr. Hwang’s office issued the statement, however, the main opposition parties made their own announcement: They plan to now seek Hwang’s impeachment, as well.

Responding to Hwang’s decision to deny an extension to that wide-ranging investigation, the leader of the main opposition Democratic Party, Choo Mi-ae, said it was now clear that Hwang was seeking "to become Park's shield to protect her and her associates."

The situation has already thrown South Korean politics into turmoil, with the threat of the nation’s first democratically elected leader being permanently thrown from office and members of the highest levels of both politics and business enmeshed in the scandal. With that in mind, even though the three main liberal opposition parties have enough parliamentary seats to secure the majority required to impeach the acting president, it is unclear whether they would actually take that step. Some are wary of potential conservative backlash if they seek a second impeachment so soon.

Yet there is another aspect to the unfolding saga: people power. Hundreds of thousands of South Koreans have been taking to the streets in protest since the corruption scandal emerged. Some are Park's supporters, including those who blame North Korea for the country's current crisis, but many are demanding that the impeached president step down.

Indeed, the levels of public engagement and protest in the wake of this scandal represent “an enormous shift in a country that the UN Human Rights Committee warned last year was making ‘increasing use of criminal defamation laws to prosecute persons who criticize government action,’ ” as The Christian Science Monitor’s Michael Holtz reported in December.

“This is unprecedented,” Park Kyung-sin, a freedom of speech advocate and law professor at Korea University in Seoul, told Mr. Holtz. “I don't think people feel at all chilled or suppressed or reluctant to speak out for fear of retaliation.”

As for Ms. Park, the former president, she remains immune from prosecution while she officially remains the country’s leader. But if the Constitutional Court decides to make her impeachment permanent, that would change – and South Korea would hold fresh presidential elections within 60 days.

This report contains material from Reuters and the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Could South Korea see second impeachment?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today