Top critic of Duterte's anti-drug crusade charged with receiving bribes from dealers

Sen. Leila de Lima, one of the most vocal critics of President Duterte and his anti-drug crackdown, has been charged by Department of Justice with receiving bribes from detained drug lords.

Romeo Ranoco/Reuters
Philippine Senator Leila de Lima is escorted by the Senate's security personnel after a Regional Trial Court (RTC) ordered her arrest, at the Senate headquarters in Pasay city, metro Manila, Philippines, on Feb. 23, 2017.

Philippine Sen. Leila de Lima has been one of the harshest critics of President Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs. Now, she herself has been charged with receiving bribes from drug dealers.

Senator de Lima has announced that she will submit to arrest and face the charges. But she denies them as a "politically motivated act," according to Reuters. "This is the kind of vindictive politics that we only expect from this regime," she added.

The charges represent the latest twist in a bloody drug war that President Duterte has pursued since taking office in June, despite the objections of domestic critics like de Lima and international human rights observers.

During his more than 20 years as mayor of Davao City, split across three different periods, Mr. Duterte gained a reputation for being tough on crime – a reputation he relished.

"In Davao, I used to do it personally. Just to show to the guys that, if I can do it, why can't you?" he told business leaders at a meeting in December of killing criminal suspects. "I'd go around in Davao with a motorcycle, with a big bike around and I would just patrol the streets and looking for trouble also. I was really looking for a confrontation, so I could kill."

Critics say that that mindset has been all too clear since Duterte won election to the country’s presidency on a promise to wipe out the drug trade. Since then, about 7,700 people have been killed in the narcotics crackdown, according to Reuters.  

About 2,500 of those deaths have been in police operations; human rights advocates allege that many of the remaining thousands were killed by vigilantes working with the police. 

De Lima headed the Senate Committee on Justice and Human Rights, which was investigating these extrajudicial killings. In September, she was replaced by an ally of Duterte, who promptly scrapped the investigation.

Around the same time, Duterte began directing sordid comments towards de Lima in public. Now, the criminal charges allege that she received a total of about five million pesos (about $100,000) in bribes from drug dealers to finance her Senate campaign. She is also accused of allowing a convicted felon to run a large drug trading business from prison. 

De Leila has vociferously denied these charges. She says they were based on testimony from high-profile inmates who were enjoying a lavish lifestyle at the country’s New Bilibid maximum-security prison – a lifestyle she exposed by ordering a raid there as Justice Secretary.

In a statement, she accused Duterte of trying to "clamp down on any vocal opposition to a policy of extrajudicial killing."

Last October, even as his drug war drew international condemnation, 83 percent of Filipinos said they had “much trust” in the president – although some commentators doubt whether his popularity is really that strong.

This report includes material from Reuters and the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.