Sao Tome won over by 'One China' as it parts diplomatic ways with Taiwan

Sao Tome and Principe will reportedly seek to restore diplomatic ties with China after ending its recognition of Taiwan, leaving the island with only 21 diplomatic allies. 

Reuters
Taiwanese Minister of Foreign Affairs David Lee speaks at a news conference after Sao Tome ended ties with Taiwan, in Taipei, Taiwan on December 21, 2016.

The African island nation of Sao Tome and Principe cut off ties with Taiwan this week, in a decision that drew kudos from China and anger from the foreign ministry of Taiwan, which China considers part of its territory.

In a statement, the Taiwanese foreign ministry condemned Sao Tome and Principe’s “abrupt and unfriendly decision,” while the Foreign Minister David Lee accused it of demanding “an astronomical amount of financial help” in exchange for continued formal recognition of Taiwan’s independence, according to the Associated Press.

Hua Chunying, a spokeswoman for China’s foreign ministry, would not tell the newswire whether China had made a financial commitment to Sao Tome and Principe, a former Portuguese colony of roughly 200,000 people where foreign aid was the source of about 90 percent of the national budget, as of 2013, according to Foreign Affairs.

But Chinese authorities have in the past acknowledged that Sao Tome was high on the list of countries from which China would seek a break in protocol toward Taiwan, and it has pursued an informal tightening of business ties in recent years.

The move may highlight how China’s growing economic clout has given it extra leverage in its ongoing efforts to isolate Taiwan, which is formally recognized by just 21 countries. And China observers say it could reflect new determination from China on that front, in the weeks following President-elect Donald Trump’s decision to receive a congratulatory phone call from Taiwanese president Tsai Ing-wen. 

That simple phone call, reported The Christian Science Monitor’s Howard LaFranchi, seemed to challenge a cornerstone of US-China relations – the “one China policy”, considered by China a nonnegotiable matter of sovereignty. The two leaders' chat was the first time a US president or president-elect has directly spoken to a Taiwanese leader since 1979, after the US established full relations with the People's Republic of China, although the US sells defensive weaponry to Taiwan. 

“I fully understand the ‘one China’ policy, but I don’t know why we have to be bound by a ‘one China’ policy unless we make a deal with China having to do with other things, including trade,” Trump told Fox News Sunday’s Chris Wallace. 

The controversy may highlight central tactic of the next president's approach to diplomacy, as the Monitor reported: "Find a country's point of highest pressure, and use it to extract more favorable conditions for the US:"

But China – which issued a calm but stern response Monday to Trump’s latest Taiwan pronouncements – is putting the president-elect on notice regarding its very different view: that placing a country’s core interests on the bargaining table is simply a recipe for rocky relations – or perhaps worse. ...

More broadly, the Chinese appear to be sending signals of their own, suggesting that Trump will face stiff global resistance if he attempts to open every issue to economic deal-making.

In a statement to Portuguese news service Lusa, Sao Tome’s government cited the “increasingly fierce defense of national interests” by other countries for its decision, as well as its own development goals. Located in the oil-rich Gulf of Guinea, the island is touted as potential producer of petroleum, although its current exports are limited to cocoa.

"We think the Beijing government should not use Sao Tome's financing black hole ... as an opportunity to push its 'one China' principle," Mr. Lee said in Taipei on Wednesday, according to Reuters.

"This behavior is not helpful to a smooth cross-Strait relationship."

This report contains material from Reuters and the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.