Why Australia hopes to soon seal a refugee deal with United States

An agreement for Australia to resettle more than 1,000 refugees in the United States is expected to be announced soon, according to reports. The government, however, has not confirmed the deal. 

David Gray/Reuters/File
Refugee advocates react as they hold placards during a protest in central Sydney, Australia, October 5, 2016 calling for the closure of the Australian detention centres located in Nauru and Manus Island.

The Australian government is close to sealing a deal that will send 1,800 refugees to the United States, according to reports, the result of a negotiation to exchange its asylum seekers for refugees from US-supported camps in Costa Rica.

The deal would most likely conclude before President-elect Donald Trump takes office next January, Australia's defense industry minister Christopher Pyne told The Wall Street Journal. Several sources told local paper The Australian that it may even come as early as this week.

After Tuesday's presidential election, the sense of urgency may have heightened over Australian ministers' fears that President-elect Trump’s stated desire for stricter immigration controls could quash the agreement. But for the Australian government, the passage of the settlement is crucial, especially as it is increasingly under fire for its treatment of refugees and asylum seekers in its two contentious offshore immigration detention centers for people who try to arrive by boat – a hardline strategy the government says is meant to deter migrants, and smugglers, from the dangerous journey. 

“We’d all dearly love to see Nauru and Manus empty,” Mr. Pyne said, referring to Australia’s two detention centers in the Pacific islands of Nauru and Papua New Guinea’s Manus Island, which critics call Australia’s “Guantanamo Bay.”

The deal with the US would resettle detainees processed on the two islands who are found to be refugees, many of who are from Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, and Sri Lanka. Some have lived on the islands with uncertain statuses for years.

Following reports over the years from newspapers and international groups such as Amnesty International and United Nations Human Rights Commission that reveal human rights violations in the camps, the Australian government has been driven to figure out what it should do with the 396 people currently in Nauru and 873 in Manus Island, according to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 

The Nauru Files compiled by The Guardian, for example, exposed cases of children being physically and sexually assaulted by guards. Aid workers were silenced from speaking out or removing children from harm, as a former Save The Children Australia worker told NPR in August.

The need for resettlement became even more pressing after Papua New Guinea ordered the closure of the Manus Island detention center in April, claiming a breach of constitutional right to freedom for the people held there. Another $55 million deal in March to send some refugees to Cambodia collapsed.

But a path for the refugees or asylum seekers to live in Australia itself doesn’t seem likely. Since 2001, refugees and asylum seekers attempting to arrive at Australia by boat were intercepted and have been sent to the islands for offshore processing. Even if they are found to be refugees, they haven’t been able to settle in Australia. The restrictions have grown more stringent in recent years, culminating in a bill passed in the lower house of parliament on Thursday that will permanently ban any asylum seekers who arrived by boat from ever receiving an Australian visa. 

“They must know that the door to Australia is closed to those who seek to come here by boat with a people smuggler: it is closed,” said Malcolm Turnbull, the prime minister of Australia. “We accept thousands of refugees and we do so willingly. But we will not tolerate any repeat of the people smuggling ventures which resulted in over 1,200 deaths at sea under the Labor party, and 50,000 unauthorised arrivals.”

Some of those currently on the islands are relieved to be free from their current conditions, The Guardian reports. But others want to see compensation for the treatment they have received.

“For me it’s hard to accept to go to America because [the Australian government] has tortured me for about four years, and now to say ‘go to America’, I question the Australian government,” Behrouz Boochani, an Iranian journalist detained on Manus Island, told the paper. “How can I get what’s right from a country like Australia that violated my human rights?”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why Australia hopes to soon seal a refugee deal with United States
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today