Week of war games begin in the South China Sea

China and Russia are conducting joint military exercises in the South China Sea, causing some to criticize the chosen location as unnecessarily provocative.

Zha Chunming/ Xinhua via AP/ File
In this July 8, 2016, file photo released by Xinhua News Agency, Chinese missile frigate Yuncheng launches an anti-ship missile during a military exercise in the waters near south China's Hainan Island and Paracel Islands. China and Russia are set to launch a week-long series of joint naval drills.

China and Russia embarked Monday on eight days of joint military exercises in the South China Sea, involving ships, aircraft, marines, and island defense and landing maneuvers.

The war games reflect deepening ties between the countries’ armed forces, and they take place in a body of water that hosts a multitude of hotly-contested territorial disputes. Not least among these is one between China and the Philippines, subject to a July ruling by an international tribunal in The Hague that roundly rejected China’s claims.

The Hague tribunal does not have the power to enforce the ruling, however, and some of the countries eyeing China's claims warily have been hesitant to press their case, seeking to balance their national interests with the burgeoning power of Beijing. To counter that reticence, President Barack Obama made an explicit statement on the situation on Thursday, during the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) summit in Laos.

"We will continue to work to ensure that disputes are resolved peacefully, including in the South China Sea," said Mr. Obama. He mentioned the ruling on the China-Philippines dispute, describing it as binding and saying it "helped to clarify maritime rights in the region."

Russia and China's military drills appear to be taking place in waters that are not specifically in dispute, and are not targeting a third party, Chinese officials say.

Last month, US Pacific Fleet commander Adm. Scott Swift described the joint drills as part of a series of activities that are "not increasing the stability within the region." 

"There are other places those exercises could have been conducted," he said, during a visit to China. 

China's official news agency, Xinhua, however, called such criticism "ill-informed" and possibly influenced by "prejudice." 

The war drills are the fifth joint naval exercises undertaken jointly by China and Russia since 2012. Russia is the only major power to have spoken out in support of China’s demands that the United States and others stay out of the South China Sea disputes.

While China dismissed The Hague’s ruling as having “no binding force,” it has not responded with any significant escalation of activity in the region. Some analysts, however, believe that China's public derision toward the ruling belies a different reality. 

“If it didn’t matter, China wouldn’t have spent so much time and energy on bullying the Philippines in an effort to make them drop the case,” Greg Poling, who directs the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said in July. “But while the court has no police force to enforce its ruling, it will likely move China toward a political resolution.”

Beijing’s diplomatic efforts have not abated, and it has sought to split the ASEAN members in an effort to dilute their criticism. China has tried to bolster relationships with those countries already inclined to lend support, such as Cambodia and, to a large extent, Laos. China recently announced a $600 million aid package for Cambodia.

A statement emerging from a meeting of ASEAN members did retain wording such as "serious concern," "reclamation" "militarization," "loss of trust," and "need to respect legal processes," however, a US official told the Associated Press – all terms China had attempted to block. 

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.