Are the US and China ready to cooperate more on N. Korea?

The two countries agreed that a UN resolution condemning North Korea's most recent nuclear test was necessary. But deep-rooted suspicions could stunt specific action.

Jacquelyn Martin/Reuters/Pool
US Secretary of State John Kerry leaves a news conference with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Beijing on Wednesday.

US Secretary of State John Kerry and China’s foreign minister agreed Wednesday on the need for a UN resolution condemning North Korea for its latest nuclear test. But the two men did not agree on specific actions to take. 

The announcement followed an apparently tense five-hour meeting in Beijing between the two top diplomats. While the decision offers a hint of progress, it also highlights the wide gulf between the US and China on what should be done to address North Korea’s growing nuclear arsenal.

Secretary Kerry, who started a three-nation Asia swing in Laos and Cambodia, vowed to raise the pressure on North Korea. He pressed China, the pariah nation’s main ally, to do the same, emphasizing that nations that "seek a global leadership role, or have a global leadership role, have a responsibility to deal with this threat." 

If China fails to do more, Kerry held out the possibility that Washington could take steps that Beijing strongly opposes, including deploying a missile system to South Korea to protect US allies in the region.

“This is a threat the United States must take extremely seriously,” Kerry said at a news conference with the Chinese foreign minister, Wang Yi, after their meeting, according to The New York Times. “The United States will take all necessary steps to protect our people and allies. We don’t want to heighten security tensions. But we won’t walk away from any options.”

For his part, Mr. Wang insisted that China was already working hard to curb North Korea’s nuclear ambitions and rejected any "groundless speculation" on its commitment to such efforts, reports Reuters.

China voted in the UN Security Council to sanction North Korea over its previous nuclear tests and condemned the latest, which took place on Jan. 6. But Wang made it clear that China was prepared to go only so far in cooperating with the US and suggested that Beijing would not support new penalties.

In addition to being Pyongyang’s closet ally, Beijing is its chief trading partner and a key source of economic assistance. 

"Sanctions are not an end in themselves," Wang said at the news conference on Wednesday. "The new resolution should not provoke new tension in the situation, still less destabilize the Korean Peninsula.”

Differences between Kerry and Wang were visible in their expressions. The Washington Post reports that the two men appeared tense as they spoke to reporters.

Wang drummed his fingers on the side of his podium as a grim-faced Kerry excoriated the actions of North Korea and its erratic leader, Kim Jong-un.

Kerry used unusually forceful language about the dangers posed by Pyongyang. Wang repeatedly mentioned the need for stability on the Korean Peninsula. While both agreed more sanctions are warranted, they said that the details would have to be resolved in talks at the United Nations Security Council in coming days.

Kerry said both sides agreed to accelerate talks on what the resolution will entail, reports The Associated Press. He said the US wants the Security Council to impose "significant new measures" to curtail North Korea's ability to advance its nuclear and ballistic missile programs and increase pressure on Pyongyang to return to disarmament talks.

The so-called six-party talks – which have included South Korea, Russia, and Japan – began in 2003, but failed to lead to a disarmament agreement. North Korea conducted its first nuclear tests in 2006 and finally quit the talks in 2009. It has since conducted three additional tests, including the one on Jan. 6.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.